From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:53062 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727411AbfKFTDl (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Nov 2019 14:03:41 -0500 Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 12:03:12 -0700 From: Alex Williamson Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 0/6] mdev based hardware virtio offloading support Message-ID: <20191106120312.77a6a318@x1.home> In-Reply-To: <393f2dc9-8c67-d3c9-6553-640b80c15aaf@redhat.com> References: <20191105093240.5135-1-jasowang@redhat.com> <20191105105834.469675f0@x1.home> <393f2dc9-8c67-d3c9-6553-640b80c15aaf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-s390-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jason Wang Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, kwankhede@nvidia.com, mst@redhat.com, tiwei.bie@intel.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, cohuck@redhat.com, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, cunming.liang@intel.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com, rob.miller@broadcom.com, xiao.w.wang@intel.com, haotian.wang@sifive.com, zhenyuw@linux.intel.com, zhi.a.wang@intel.com, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch, farman@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, sebott@linux.ibm.com, oberpar@linux.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, akrowiak@linux.ibm.com, freude@linux.ibm.com, lingshan.zhu@intel.com, idos@mellanox.com, eperezma@redhat.com, lulu@redhat.com, parav@mellanox.com, christophe.de.dinechin@gmail.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, stefanha@redhat.com On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 11:56:46 +0800 Jason Wang wrote: > On 2019/11/6 =E4=B8=8A=E5=8D=881:58, Alex Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:32:34 +0800 > > Jason Wang wrote: > > =20 > >> Hi all: > >> > >> There are hardwares that can do virtio datapath offloading while > >> having its own control path. This path tries to implement a mdev based > >> unified API to support using kernel virtio driver to drive those > >> devices. This is done by introducing a new mdev transport for virtio > >> (virtio_mdev) and register itself as a new kind of mdev driver. Then > >> it provides a unified way for kernel virtio driver to talk with mdev > >> device implementation. > >> > >> Though the series only contains kernel driver support, the goal is to > >> make the transport generic enough to support userspace drivers. This > >> means vhost-mdev[1] could be built on top as well by resuing the > >> transport. > >> > >> A sample driver is also implemented which simulate a virito-net > >> loopback ethernet device on top of vringh + workqueue. This could be > >> used as a reference implementation for real hardware driver. > >> > >> Also a real ICF VF driver was also posted here[2] which is a good > >> reference for vendors who is interested in their own virtio datapath > >> offloading product. > >> > >> Consider mdev framework only support VFIO device and driver right now, > >> this series also extend it to support other types. This is done > >> through introducing class id to the device and pairing it with > >> id_talbe claimed by the driver. On top, this seris also decouple > >> device specific parents ops out of the common ones. > >> > >> Pktgen test was done with virito-net + mvnet loop back device. > >> > >> Please review. > >> > >> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/31/440 > >> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/15/1226 > >> > >> Changes from V7: > >> - drop {set|get}_mdev_features for virtio > >> - typo and comment style fixes =20 > > > > Seems we're nearly there, all the remaining comments are relatively > > superficial, though I would appreciate a v9 addressing them as well as > > the checkpatch warnings: > > > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/68977/ =20 >=20 >=20 > Will do. >=20 > Btw, do you plan to merge vhost-mdev patch on top? Or you prefer it to=20 > go through Michael's vhost tree? I can include it if you wish. The mdev changes are isolated enough in that patch that I wouldn't presume it, but clearly it would require less merge coordination to drop it in my tree. Let me know. Thanks, Alex