From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:41674 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726053AbgANRoV (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jan 2020 12:44:21 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 18:44:11 +0100 From: Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/4] s390x: smp: Only use smp_cpu_setup once Message-ID: <20200114184411.24909aae.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200114153054.77082-3-frankja@linux.ibm.com> References: <20200114153054.77082-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com> <20200114153054.77082-3-frankja@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-s390-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Janosch Frank Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, thuth@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 10:30:51 -0500 Janosch Frank wrote: > Let's stop and start instead of using setup to run a function on a > cpu. Looking at the code, we only support active == operating state and !active == stopped state anyway, right? > > Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank > --- > s390x/smp.c | 19 ++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck