From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:49074 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726642AbgATR7I (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jan 2020 12:59:08 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 18:59:01 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Impveovements for random.h/archrandom.h Message-ID: <20200120175901.GB576@zn.tnic> References: <20200110145422.49141-1-broonie@kernel.org> <20200110155153.GG19453@zn.tnic> <20200110170559.GA304349@mit.edu> <20200120172627.GH6852@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200120172627.GH6852@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-s390-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mark Brown Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , Andrew Morton , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Richard Henderson , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, x86@kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 05:26:27PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > I think the important thing here is that *someone* takes the patches. > We've now got Ted and Borislav both saying they're OK applying the > patches, an additional proposal that Andrew takes the patches, nobody > saying anything negative about applying the patches and yet the patches > are not applied. The random tree sounds like a sensible enough tree to > take this so if Ted picks them up perhaps that's most sensible? Yes, Ted, pls pick them up so that we're done with this. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette