From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:49326 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728001AbgBCLTe (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Feb 2020 06:19:34 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 12:19:21 +0100 From: Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 3/7] s390x: Stop the cpu that is executing exit() Message-ID: <20200203121921.2999fee9.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200201152851.82867-4-frankja@linux.ibm.com> References: <20200201152851.82867-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com> <20200201152851.82867-4-frankja@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-s390-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Janosch Frank Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, thuth@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 10:28:47 -0500 Janosch Frank wrote: > CPU 0 is not necessarily the CPU which does the exit if we ran into a > test abort situation. So, let's ask stap() which cpu does the exit and > stop it on exit. > > Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank > --- > lib/s390x/io.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck