From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:42981 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727781AbgBUNpx (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:45:53 -0500 Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:45:38 +0100 From: Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/37] KVM: s390: Add support for protected VMs Message-ID: <20200221144538.032f4b0e.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1c54d830-79de-e3ee-4c11-d87f95f90c57@redhat.com> References: <20200220104020.5343-1-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <5556ee4a-09c6-117a-be99-4a5e136b78ea@redhat.com> <0665a90a-19f2-39a8-8a48-d180a622e9f2@de.ibm.com> <1c54d830-79de-e3ee-4c11-d87f95f90c57@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-s390-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Hildenbrand Cc: Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , Andrew Morton , KVM , Thomas Huth , Ulrich Weigand , Claudio Imbrenda , linux-s390 , Michael Mueller , Vasily Gorbik , Andrea Arcangeli , linux-mm@kvack.org On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:28:51 +0100 David Hildenbrand wrote: > >> Can we get a new version once the other reviewers are done, so at least > >> I can have a final look? > > > > Just the updated patches as reply (e.g. a 3.2 for patch 9) or the full monty? > > Whatever you others prefer. I can see that Conny has some feedback. > maybe wait for that and then (selectively) resend. I was still looking over this version. And to be honest, I find those 3.x patches utterly confusing, especially as this is all coming in so quickly as to make it hard to keep up. That said, I'll probably not be able to do much (or any) reviewing today or on Monday, so feel free to send a new version next week.