From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:47161 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728316AbgDUPD6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:03:58 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 17:03:54 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: stop using ioctl_by_bdev in the s390 DASD driver Message-ID: <20200421150354.GA10191@lst.de> References: <20200421061226.33731-1-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-s390-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stefan Haberland Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jan Hoeppner , Jens Axboe , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 04:17:53PM +0200, Stefan Haberland wrote: > I can imagine some ways to get rid of this ioctl_by_bdev. Maybe having a > udev > rule to add a partition from userspace or having the driver add the implicit > partition at the end. Or maybe something else. > > If it is OK I will have a look at this and discuss this issue with my > colleagues and come up with a different approach. Sure, we can wait a few days. Note that I don't want to break existing userspace, which kinda speaks against a udev solution.