From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:48526 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2391022AbgE1OWw (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2020 10:22:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 16:22:43 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: [PULL 00/10] vfio-ccw patches for 5.8 Message-ID: <20200528162243.7ee3a352.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20200525094115.222299-1-cohuck@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-s390-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Vasily Gorbik Cc: Heiko Carstens , Christian Borntraeger , Eric Farman , Halil Pasic , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 28 May 2020 14:42:31 +0200 Vasily Gorbik wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 11:41:05AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > The following changes since commit 6a8b55ed4056ea5559ebe4f6a4b247f627870d4c: > > > > Linux 5.7-rc3 (2020-04-26 13:51:02 -0700) > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/vfio-ccw tags/vfio-ccw-20200525 > > Hello Conny, > > s390/features is based on v5.7-rc2 rather than on v5.7-rc3 as your > tags/vfio-ccw-20200525. Are there any pre-requisites in between for > vfio-ccw changes? It does cleanly rebase onto v5.7-rc2. There shouldn't be anything. > > Could you please rebase onto v5.7-rc2 or s390/features if that's possible? Ugh. Isn't there any way to avoid doing that?