From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:35546 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726279AbgFLNOI (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2020 09:14:08 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 15:14:05 +0200 From: Petr Mladek Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] printk: Make linux/printk.h self-contained Message-ID: <20200612131405.GI4311@linux-b0ei> References: <20200611125144.GA2506@gondor.apana.org.au> <20200612043634.GA30181@gondor.apana.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200612043634.GA30181@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: linux-s390-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Herbert Xu Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , Steven Rostedt , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org On Fri 2020-06-12 14:36:35, Herbert Xu wrote: > As it stands if you include printk.h by itself it will fail to > compile because it requires definitions from ratelimit.h. However, > simply including ratelimit.h from printk.h does not work due to > inclusion loops involving sched.h and kernel.h. > > This patch solves this by moving bits from ratelimit.h into a new > header file which can then be included by printk.h without any > worries about header loops. > > The build bot then revealed some intriguing failures arising out > of this patch. On s390 there is an inclusion loop with asm/bug.h > and linux/kernel.h that triggers a compile failure, because kernel.h > will cause asm-generic/bug.h to be included before s390's own > asm/bug.h has finished processing. This has been fixed by not > including kernel.h in arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h. > > A related failure was seen on powerpc where asm/bug.h leads to > the inclusion of linux/kernel.h via asm-generic/bug.h which then > prematurely tries to use the very macros defined in asm/bug.h. > The particular inclusion path which led to this involves lockdep.h. > I have fixed this moving the type definitions lockdep.h into the > new lockdep_types.h. > > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu I am fine with the changes as long as the kernel test robot does not complain ;-) Acked-by: Petr Mladek Well, I wonder if PeterZ is fine with the lockdep part. It might make sense to split it into separate patch as a prerequisite. Best Regards, Petr