From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:33935 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729875AbgFOPJa (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 11:09:30 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 17:09:26 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] exec: simplify the compat syscall handling Message-ID: <20200615150926.GA17108@lst.de> References: <20200615130032.931285-1-hch@lst.de> <20200615130032.931285-3-hch@lst.de> <20200615141239.GA12951@lst.de> <20200615144310.GA15101@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-s390-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Al Viro , Luis Chamberlain , Linux ARM , the arch/x86 maintainers , "open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" , Parisc List , linuxppc-dev , linux-s390 , sparclinux , Linux FS-devel Mailing List , linux-arch , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 04:46:15PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > How about this one: > > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c > index 3d8d70d3896c..0ce15807cf54 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c > @@ -16,6 +16,9 @@ > #undef __SYSCALL_X32 > #undef __SYSCALL_COMMON > > +#define __x32_sys_execve __x64_sys_execve > +#define __x32_sys_execveat __x64_sys_execveat > + arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c:19:26: error: ‘__x64_sys_execve’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘__x32_sys_execve’? 19 | #define __x32_sys_execve __x64_sys_execve | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c:22:39: note: in expansion of macro ‘__x32_sys_execve’ 22 | #define __SYSCALL_X32(nr, sym) [nr] = __x32_##sym, | ^~~~~~ ./arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:344:1: note: in expansion of macro ‘__SYSCALL_X32’ 344 | __SYSCALL_X32(520, sys_execve) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c:20:28: error: ‘__x64_sys_execveat’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘__x32_sys_execveat’? 20 | #define __x32_sys_execveat __x64_sys_execveat | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c:22:39: note: in expansion of macro ‘__x32_sys_execveat’ 22 | #define __SYSCALL_X32(nr, sym) [nr] = __x32_##sym, | ^~~~~~ ./arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:369:1: note: in expansion of macro ‘__SYSCALL_X32’ 369 | __SYSCALL_X32(545, sys_execveat) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:281: arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:497: arch/x86/entry] Error 2 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... kernel/exit.o: warning: objtool: __x64_sys_exit_group()+0x14: unreachable instruction make: *** [Makefile:1764: arch/x86] Error 2 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....