From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52698 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389836AbgFXOoM (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jun 2020 10:44:12 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:43:11 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Message-ID: <20200624144311.GA5839@infradead.org> References: <20200610154923.27510-5-mcgrof@kernel.org> <20200623141157.5409-1-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <3118dc0d-a3af-9337-c897-2380062a8644@de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3118dc0d-a3af-9337-c897-2380062a8644@de.ibm.com> Sender: linux-s390-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: mcgrof@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, bfields@fieldses.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, chainsaw@gentoo.org, christian.brauner@ubuntu.com, chuck.lever@oracle.com, davem@davemloft.net, dhowells@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com, jmorris@namei.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, keescook@chromium.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, lars.ellenberg@linbit.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, philipp.reisner@linbit.com, ravenexp@gmail.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, serge@hallyn.com, slyfox@gentoo.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, yangtiezhu@loongson.cn, netdev@vger.kernel.org, markward@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390 On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 01:11:54PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Does anyone have an idea why "umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used" breaks the > linux-bridge on s390? Are we even sure this is s390 specific and doesn't happen on other architectures with the same bridge setup?