Re: [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 00/11] s390x patches

Janosch Frank
2020-07-31T12:31:31Z

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1313 bytes --]

On 7/31/20 2:09 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 31/07/2020 13.31, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> On 7/31/20 12:31 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 31/07/20 11:45, Janosch Frank wrote:
>>>> https://github.com/frankjaa/kvm-unit-tests.git tags/s390x-2020-31-07
>>>
>>> Pulled, thanks. FWIW you may want to gitlab in order to get the CI.
>>>
>>> Paolo
>>>
>>
>> Hey Paolo, that repository is hooked up to travis already:
>> https://travis-ci.com/github/frankjaa/kvm-unit-tests/builds/177931162
>>
>> I'll consider it if it has any benefit.
>> @Thomas: Are there differences in the CI?
>
> Not that much, you get a good build test coverage with both. Travis uses
> real (nested) KVM tests, but the compiler and QEMU versions are a little
> bit backlevel (still using Ubuntu bionic). Gitlab-CI uses newer versions
> (thanks to Fedora 32), but there is no KVM support here, so the tests
> run with TCG only (I'm thinking of adding the cirrus-run script to the
> Gitlab-CI, maybe we could get some KVM-coverage that way there, too, but
> that will certainly take some time to figure it out).
>
> Thomas
>

Thanks for the answer!

For now I'll stay with github/travis until I have a real reason to move
over. Maybe if the qemu CI run doesn't take ~2h on gitlab I'll start
considering moving.

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]