From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:64900 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725977AbgJDNOA (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Oct 2020 09:14:00 -0400 Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 15:14:00 +0200 From: Karsten Graul Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net/smc: send ISM devices with unique chid in CLC proposal Message-Id: <20201004151400.bb5b1aa84b08e45ea79b54e9@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20201003.170538.1607088552412478587.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20201002150927.72261-1-kgraul@linux.ibm.com> <20201002150927.72261-2-kgraul@linux.ibm.com> <20201003.170538.1607088552412478587.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: To: David Miller Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, raspl@linux.ibm.com, ubraun@linux.ibm.com On Sat, 03 Oct 2020 17:05:38 -0700 (PDT) David Miller wrote: > Series applied, but could you send a proper patch series in the future > with a "[PATCH 0/N] ..." header posting? It must explain what the > patch series does at a high level, how it is doing it, and why it is > doing it that way. > > Thank you. Hi Dave, not sure what went wrong but I sent the header posting along with the patches, see https://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2020/10/02/197 -- Karsten Graul