From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57888 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2502779AbgJVUJV (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:09:21 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 21:09:14 +0100 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c" Message-ID: <20201022200914.GY3576660@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <5fd6003b-55a6-2c3c-9a28-8fd3a575ca78@redhat.com> <20201022132342.GB8781@lst.de> <8f1fff0c358b4b669d51cc80098dbba1@AcuMS.aculab.com> <20201022192458.GV3576660@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20201022200629.GX3576660@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201022200629.GX3576660@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: Al Viro List-ID: To: Nick Desaulniers Cc: Arnd Bergmann , David Laight , Christoph Hellwig , David Hildenbrand , Greg KH , "kernel-team@android.com" , Andrew Morton , Jens Axboe , David Howells , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mips@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" , "sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-aio@kvack.org" , "io-uring@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "keyrings@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 09:06:29PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 08:24:58PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > > Depending upon the calling conventions, compiler might do truncation in caller or > > in a callee, but it must be done _somewhere_. > > Unless I'm misreading AAPCS64, > "Unlike in the 32-bit AAPCS, named integral values must be narrowed by the callee > rather than the caller" > in 6.4.2 means that callee must not _not_ expect the upper 32 bits of %x0..%x7 to contain Sorry, artefact of editing - that's "in 6.4.2 means that callee must _not_ expect the upper 32 bits of %x0..%x7 to contain" obviously.