From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:46544 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726010AbgKFO1m (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 09:27:42 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 15:27:38 +0100 From: Petr Mladek Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11 v3] ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion Message-ID: <20201106142738.GX20201@alley> References: <20201106023235.367190737@goodmis.org> <20201106023548.102375687@goodmis.org> <20201106131317.GW20201@alley> <20201106084131.7dfc3a30@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201106084131.7dfc3a30@gandalf.local.home> List-ID: To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Josh Poimboeuf , Jiri Kosina , Miroslav Benes , Jonathan Corbet , Guo Ren , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Helge Deller , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Kees Cook , Anton Vorontsov , Colin Cross , Tony Luck , Joe Lawrence , Kamalesh Babulal , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org On Fri 2020-11-06 08:41:31, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 14:13:17 +0100 > Petr Mladek wrote: > > > JFYI, the code reading and writing the cache looks good to me. > > > > It is still possible that some entries might stay unused (filled > > with zeroes) but it should be hard to hit in practice. It > > is good enough from my POV. > > You mean the part that was commented? Yeah, it is the comment problem when nr_records is pushed forward. > > > > I do not give Reviewed-by tag just because I somehow do not have power > > to review the entire patch carefully enough at the moment. > > No problem. Thanks for looking at it. > > I'm adding a link to this thread, so if someone wants proof you helped out > on this code, you can have them follow the links ;-) > > Anyway, even if I push this to linux-next where I stop rebasing code > (because of test coverage), I do rebase for adding tags. So if you ever get > around at looking at this code, I can add that tag later (before the next > merge window), or if you find something, I could fix it with a new patch and > give you a Reported-by. Good to know. Best Regards, Petr