From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49610 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229506AbhBGOtO (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Feb 2021 09:49:14 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-x22f.google.com (mail-lj1-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDFC7C061756 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 06:48:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id a17so13603536ljq.2 for ; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 06:48:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 17:48:31 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: Disallow CONFIG_TMPFS_INODE64 on s390 Message-ID: <20210207144831.lsrm74ypbz7i37uz@box> References: <20210205230620.518245-1-seth.forshee@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210205230620.518245-1-seth.forshee@canonical.com> List-ID: To: Seth Forshee Cc: Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , Chris Down , Amir Goldstein , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 05:06:20PM -0600, Seth Forshee wrote: > This feature requires ino_t be 64-bits, which is true for every > 64-bit architecture but s390, so prevent this option from being > selected there. Quick grep suggests the same for alpha. Am I wrong? -- Kirill A. Shutemov