From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests RFC 2/2] s390x: mvpg: Add SIE mvpg test
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 09:47:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210520094730.55759-3-frankja@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210520094730.55759-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Let's also check the PEI values to make sure our VSIE implementation
is correct.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
s390x/Makefile | 3 +-
s390x/mvpg-sie.c | 139 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
s390x/snippets/c/mvpg-snippet.c | 33 ++++++++
s390x/unittests.cfg | 3 +
4 files changed, 177 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 s390x/mvpg-sie.c
create mode 100644 s390x/snippets/c/mvpg-snippet.c
diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
index fe267011..6692cf73 100644
--- a/s390x/Makefile
+++ b/s390x/Makefile
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/uv-guest.elf
tests += $(TEST_DIR)/sie.elf
tests += $(TEST_DIR)/mvpg.elf
tests += $(TEST_DIR)/uv-host.elf
+tests += $(TEST_DIR)/mvpg-sie.elf
tests_binary = $(patsubst %.elf,%.bin,$(tests))
ifneq ($(HOST_KEY_DOCUMENT),)
@@ -79,7 +80,7 @@ FLATLIBS = $(libcflat)
SNIPPET_DIR = $(TEST_DIR)/snippets
# C snippets that need to be linked
-snippets-c =
+snippets-c = $(SNIPPET_DIR)/c/mvpg-snippet.gbin
# ASM snippets that are directly compiled and converted to a *.gbin
snippets-a =
diff --git a/s390x/mvpg-sie.c b/s390x/mvpg-sie.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a617704b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/s390x/mvpg-sie.c
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+#include <libcflat.h>
+#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
+#include <asm-generic/barrier.h>
+#include <asm/interrupt.h>
+#include <asm/pgtable.h>
+#include <mmu.h>
+#include <asm/page.h>
+#include <asm/facility.h>
+#include <asm/mem.h>
+#include <asm/sigp.h>
+#include <smp.h>
+#include <alloc_page.h>
+#include <bitops.h>
+#include <vm.h>
+#include <sclp.h>
+#include <sie.h>
+
+static u8 *guest;
+static u8 *guest_instr;
+static struct vm vm;
+
+static uint8_t *src;
+static uint8_t *dst;
+
+extern const char _binary_s390x_snippets_c_mvpg_snippet_gbin_start[];
+extern const char _binary_s390x_snippets_c_mvpg_snippet_gbin_end[];
+int binary_size;
+
+static void handle_validity(struct vm *vm)
+{
+ report(0, "VALIDITY: %x", vm->sblk->ipb >> 16);
+}
+
+static void sie(struct vm *vm)
+{
+ /* Reset icptcode so we don't trip below */
+ vm->sblk->icptcode = 0;
+
+ while (vm->sblk->icptcode == 0) {
+ sie64a(vm->sblk, &vm->save_area);
+ if (vm->sblk->icptcode == ICPT_VALIDITY)
+ handle_validity(vm);
+ }
+ vm->save_area.guest.grs[14] = vm->sblk->gg14;
+ vm->save_area.guest.grs[15] = vm->sblk->gg15;
+}
+
+static void test_mvpg_pei(void)
+{
+ uint64_t **pei_dst = (uint64_t **)((uintptr_t) vm.sblk + 0xc0);
+ uint64_t **pei_src = (uint64_t **)((uintptr_t) vm.sblk + 0xc8);
+
+ report_prefix_push("pei");
+ protect_page(guest + 0x6000, PAGE_ENTRY_I);
+ sie(&vm);
+ report(vm.sblk->icptcode == ICPT_PARTEXEC, "Partial execution");
+ report((uintptr_t)**pei_src == ((uintptr_t)vm.sblk->mso) + 0x6000 + PAGE_ENTRY_I, "PEI_SRC correct");
+ report((uintptr_t)**pei_dst == vm.sblk->mso + 0x5000, "PEI_DST correct");
+ /* Jump over the diag44 */
+ sie(&vm);
+
+ /* Clear PEI data for next check */
+ memset((uint64_t *)((uintptr_t) vm.sblk + 0xc0), 0, 16);
+ unprotect_page(guest + 0x6000, PAGE_ENTRY_I);
+ protect_page(guest + 0x5000, PAGE_ENTRY_I);
+ sie(&vm);
+ report(vm.sblk->icptcode == ICPT_PARTEXEC, "Partial execution");
+ report((uintptr_t)**pei_src == vm.sblk->mso + 0x6000, "PEI_SRC correct");
+ report((uintptr_t)**pei_dst == vm.sblk->mso + 0x5000 + PAGE_ENTRY_I, "PEI_DST correct");
+
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+static void test_mvpg(void)
+{
+ int binary_size = ((uintptr_t)_binary_s390x_snippets_c_mvpg_snippet_gbin_end -
+ (uintptr_t)_binary_s390x_snippets_c_mvpg_snippet_gbin_start);
+
+ memcpy(guest, _binary_s390x_snippets_c_mvpg_snippet_gbin_start, binary_size);
+ memset(src, 0x42, PAGE_SIZE);
+ memset(dst, 0x43, PAGE_SIZE);
+ sie(&vm);
+ mb();
+ report(!memcmp(src, dst, PAGE_SIZE) && *dst == 0x42, "Page moved");
+}
+
+static void setup_guest(void)
+{
+ setup_vm();
+
+ /* Allocate 1MB as guest memory */
+ guest = alloc_pages(8);
+ /* The first two pages are the lowcore */
+ guest_instr = guest + PAGE_SIZE * 2;
+
+ vm.sblk = alloc_page();
+
+ vm.sblk->cpuflags = CPUSTAT_ZARCH | CPUSTAT_RUNNING;
+ vm.sblk->prefix = 0;
+ /*
+ * Pageable guest with the same ASCE as the test programm, but
+ * the guest memory 0x0 is offset to start at the allocated
+ * guest pages and end after 1MB.
+ *
+ * It's not pretty but faster and easier than managing guest ASCEs.
+ */
+ vm.sblk->mso = (u64)guest;
+ vm.sblk->msl = (u64)guest;
+ vm.sblk->ihcpu = 0xffff;
+
+ vm.sblk->crycbd = (uint64_t)alloc_page();
+
+ vm.sblk->gpsw.addr = PAGE_SIZE * 4;
+ vm.sblk->gpsw.mask = 0x0000000180000000ULL;
+ vm.sblk->ictl = ICTL_OPEREXC | ICTL_PINT;
+ /* Enable MVPG interpretation as we want to test KVM and not ourselves */
+ vm.sblk->eca = ECA_MVPGI;
+
+ src = guest + PAGE_SIZE * 6;
+ dst = guest + PAGE_SIZE * 5;
+}
+
+int main(void)
+{
+ report_prefix_push("mvpg-sie");
+ if (!sclp_facilities.has_sief2) {
+ report_skip("SIEF2 facility unavailable");
+ goto done;
+ }
+
+ setup_guest();
+ test_mvpg();
+ test_mvpg_pei();
+
+done:
+ report_prefix_pop();
+ return report_summary();
+
+}
diff --git a/s390x/snippets/c/mvpg-snippet.c b/s390x/snippets/c/mvpg-snippet.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..96b70c9c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/s390x/snippets/c/mvpg-snippet.c
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+#include <libcflat.h>
+
+static inline void force_exit(void)
+{
+ asm volatile(" diag 0,0,0x44\n");
+}
+
+static inline int mvpg(unsigned long r0, void *dest, void *src)
+{
+ register unsigned long reg0 asm ("0") = r0;
+ int cc;
+
+ asm volatile(" mvpg %1,%2\n"
+ " ipm %0\n"
+ " srl %0,28"
+ : "=&d" (cc) : "a" (dest), "a" (src), "d" (reg0)
+ : "memory", "cc");
+ return cc;
+}
+
+static void test_mvpg_real(void)
+{
+ mvpg(0, (void *)0x5000, (void *)0x6000);
+ force_exit();
+}
+
+__attribute__((section(".text"))) int main(void)
+{
+ test_mvpg_real();
+ test_mvpg_real();
+ test_mvpg_real();
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/s390x/unittests.cfg b/s390x/unittests.cfg
index 9f81a608..8634b1b1 100644
--- a/s390x/unittests.cfg
+++ b/s390x/unittests.cfg
@@ -103,3 +103,6 @@ file = sie.elf
[mvpg]
file = mvpg.elf
timeout = 10
+
+[mvpg-sie]
+file = mvpg-sie.elf
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-20 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-20 9:47 [kvm-unit-tests RFC 0/2] s390x: Add snippet support Janosch Frank
2021-05-20 9:47 ` [kvm-unit-tests RFC 1/2] s390x: Add guest " Janosch Frank
2021-05-25 16:44 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-05-26 10:12 ` Janosch Frank
2021-06-21 10:10 ` Thomas Huth
2021-06-21 12:19 ` Janosch Frank
2021-06-21 12:32 ` Thomas Huth
2021-06-21 12:39 ` Janosch Frank
2021-06-21 13:28 ` Thomas Huth
2021-06-21 14:42 ` Janosch Frank
2021-06-21 14:59 ` Thomas Huth
2021-05-20 9:47 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2021-05-25 17:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests RFC 2/2] s390x: mvpg: Add SIE mvpg test Claudio Imbrenda
2021-05-26 10:17 ` Janosch Frank
2021-05-27 14:35 ` Janosch Frank
2021-06-21 10:23 ` Thomas Huth
2021-06-21 12:41 ` Janosch Frank
2021-05-20 13:36 ` [kvm-unit-tests RFC 0/2] s390x: Add snippet support David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210520094730.55759-3-frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).