From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, akrowiak@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/vfio-ap: Fix module unload memory leak of matrix_dev
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 11:59:59 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210618145959.GF1002214@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ea3de71-9d68-59c6-bfb8-d8258019e585@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:35:21AM -0400, Jason J. Herne wrote:
> On 6/18/21 10:10 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 09:35:24AM -0400, Jason J. Herne wrote:
> > > vfio_ap_matrix_dev_release is shadowing the global matrix_dev with driver
> > > data that never gets set. So when release is called we end up not freeing
> > > matrix_dev. The fix is to remove the shadow variable and just free the
> > > global.
> >
> > I would clarify this commit message to say that the drv_data of the
> > matrix_dev is never set and so dev_get_drvdata() always returns NULL
> >
> > And I would suggest to use
> >
> > container_of(dev, struct ap_matrix_dev, dev)
> >
> > instead of the global variable, and probably NULL the global
> > too..
> >
>
> The use of driver_data seems to have been completely erroneous here. In this
> case the global matrix_dev is the top level struct. It is not contained in
> anything. matrix_dev is created upon module load, and it is freed when the
> module exits.
>
> So I don't think using container_of makes sense. Unless I've
> misunderstood your suggestion?
matrix_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*matrix_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
matrix_dev->device.release = vfio_ap_matrix_dev_release;
ret = device_register(&matrix_dev->device);
"dev" is contained inside matrix_dev which is why we should use
container of to go from a struct device pointer back to the containing
matrix_dev pointer
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-18 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-18 13:35 [PATCH] s390/vfio-ap: Fix module unload memory leak of matrix_dev Jason J. Herne
2021-06-18 14:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-06-18 14:35 ` Jason J. Herne
2021-06-18 14:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-06-18 15:31 ` Tony Krowiak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210618145959.GF1002214@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).