From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA51C43217 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 07:52:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241475AbiBBHwG (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2022 02:52:06 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:33222 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231368AbiBBHwE (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2022 02:52:04 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id D45AE67373; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:51:59 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:51:59 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: guoren@kernel.org Cc: palmer@dabbelt.com, arnd@arndb.de, anup@brainfault.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, liush@allwinnertech.com, wefu@redhat.com, drew@beagleboard.org, wangjunqiang@iscas.ac.cn, hch@lst.de, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org, Guo Ren Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 15/21] riscv: compat: Add hw capability check for elf Message-ID: <20220202075159.GB18398@lst.de> References: <20220201150545.1512822-1-guoren@kernel.org> <20220201150545.1512822-16-guoren@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220201150545.1512822-16-guoren@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 11:05:39PM +0800, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > +bool compat_elf_check_arch(Elf32_Ehdr *hdr) > +{ > + if (compat_mode_support && (hdr->e_machine == EM_RISCV)) > + return true; > + else > + return false; > +} This can be simplified to: return compat_mode_support && hdr->e_machine == EM_RISCV; I'd also rename compat_mode_support to compat_mode_supported > + > +static int compat_mode_detect(void) > +{ > + unsigned long tmp = csr_read(CSR_STATUS); > + > + csr_write(CSR_STATUS, (tmp & ~SR_UXL) | SR_UXL_32); > + > + if ((csr_read(CSR_STATUS) & SR_UXL) != SR_UXL_32) { > + pr_info("riscv: 32bit compat mode detect failed\n"); > + compat_mode_support = false; > + } else { > + compat_mode_support = true; > + pr_info("riscv: 32bit compat mode detected\n"); > + } I don't think we need these printks here. Also this could be simplified to: compat_mode_supported = (csr_read(CSR_STATUS) & SR_UXL) == SR_UXL_32;