From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948F6C433EF for ; Mon, 23 May 2022 13:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236125AbiEWNYS (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2022 09:24:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50214 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236120AbiEWNYR (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2022 09:24:17 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B20449CBA; Mon, 23 May 2022 06:24:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 24ND0Xgn017719; Mon, 23 May 2022 13:24:14 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=H8AGerif3e2bUJ7vC2uLQnpBiDlHaQMNSt1wzNsxkq0=; b=GusK7RqRcrNYNNz1H/U9kXYLX6iM1AkfTocrBUWxBNNd+p8+6bMCMK/i6cpEUcVJjpyQ u6zp6LeHzHVuclZwufbsmOAAiDe7vfFOpOH2qWKw1TekHPUWYh4yoW4oIiJurvEvbKT1 MJFTKc1Gk4su25pVXBHNj4lQw/P4sVI6qm6WkAquBWvxBjU6xLtB6OA5N7QphlM4x0v/ jb8FCHJE/BvxCPplcpJ9N1oPInuzNGViQEFEJl9utfmbX0epQWKtxt5IgPUFn/HZ+sVy hsyN5svgWy9QrqbO/318hPGz0+SZfJVVdGe8FRwLFofCElvQYecPJp6vD4M/QuhJTQ2t mQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3g72avbj7m-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 23 May 2022 13:24:14 +0000 Received: from m0098414.ppops.net (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 24NDHcLc023924; Mon, 23 May 2022 13:24:13 GMT Received: from ppma02fra.de.ibm.com (47.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.71]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3g72avbj75-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 23 May 2022 13:24:13 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 24ND6Dh0014943; Mon, 23 May 2022 13:24:11 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by ppma02fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3g6qq937kp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 23 May 2022 13:24:11 +0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 24NDO8Am38338982 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 23 May 2022 13:24:08 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C094FA404D; Mon, 23 May 2022 13:24:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87441A4040; Mon, 23 May 2022 13:24:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.85.9]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2022 13:24:08 +0000 (GMT) From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch To: Thomas Huth , Janosch Frank , Claudio Imbrenda Cc: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch , David Hildenbrand , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/3] s390x: Test TEID values in storage key test Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 15:24:04 +0200 Message-Id: <20220523132406.1820550-2-scgl@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 In-Reply-To: <20220523132406.1820550-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com> References: <20220523132406.1820550-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: UUtaC7nw2qkoXcoLgWQ7wSGs_gZwvWeH X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: n7EsSKgC4248AKwCyLck_ir5aThk6yhI X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.874,Hydra:6.0.486,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-05-23_06,2022-05-23_01,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2205230073 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org On a protection exception, test that the Translation-Exception Identification (TEID) values are correct given the circumstances of the particular test. The meaning of the TEID values is dependent on the installed suppression-on-protection facility. Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch --- s390x/skey.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/s390x/skey.c b/s390x/skey.c index 42bf598c..5e234cde 100644 --- a/s390x/skey.c +++ b/s390x/skey.c @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ * Janosch Frank */ #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -158,6 +159,68 @@ static void test_test_protection(void) report_prefix_pop(); } +enum access { + ACC_STORE = 1, + ACC_FETCH = 2, + ACC_UPDATE = 3, +}; + +enum protection { + PROT_STORE = 1, + PROT_FETCH_STORE = 3, +}; + +static void check_key_prot_exc(enum access access, enum protection prot) +{ + union teid teid; + int access_code; + + check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PROTECTION); + report_prefix_push("TEID"); + teid.val = lowcore.trans_exc_id; + switch (get_supp_on_prot_facility()) { + case SOP_NONE: + case SOP_BASIC: + break; + case SOP_ENHANCED_1: + report(!teid.esop1_acc_list_or_dat, "valid protection code"); + break; + case SOP_ENHANCED_2: + switch (teid_esop2_prot_code(teid)) { + case PROT_KEY: + access_code = teid.acc_exc_f_s; + + switch (access_code) { + case 0: + report_pass("valid access code"); + break; + case 1: + case 2: + report((access & access_code) && (prot & access_code), + "valid access code"); + break; + case 3: + /* + * This is incorrect in that reserved values + * should be ignored, but kvm should not return + * a reserved value and having a test for that + * is more valuable. + */ + report_fail("valid access code"); + break; + } + /* fallthrough */ + case PROT_KEY_LAP: + report_pass("valid protection code"); + break; + default: + report_fail("valid protection code"); + } + break; + } + report_prefix_pop(); +} + /* * Perform STORE CPU ADDRESS (STAP) instruction while temporarily executing * with access key 1. @@ -199,7 +262,7 @@ static void test_store_cpu_address(void) expect_pgm_int(); *out = 0xbeef; store_cpu_address_key_1(out); - check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PROTECTION); + check_key_prot_exc(ACC_STORE, PROT_STORE); report(*out == 0xbeef, "no store occurred"); report_prefix_pop(); @@ -210,7 +273,7 @@ static void test_store_cpu_address(void) expect_pgm_int(); *out = 0xbeef; store_cpu_address_key_1(out); - check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PROTECTION); + check_key_prot_exc(ACC_STORE, PROT_STORE); report(*out == 0xbeef, "no store occurred"); report_prefix_pop(); @@ -228,7 +291,7 @@ static void test_store_cpu_address(void) expect_pgm_int(); *out = 0xbeef; store_cpu_address_key_1(out); - check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PROTECTION); + check_key_prot_exc(ACC_STORE, PROT_STORE); report(*out == 0xbeef, "no store occurred"); report_prefix_pop(); @@ -314,7 +377,7 @@ static void test_set_prefix(void) set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x28, 0); expect_pgm_int(); set_prefix_key_1(prefix_ptr); - check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PROTECTION); + check_key_prot_exc(ACC_FETCH, PROT_FETCH_STORE); report(get_prefix() == old_prefix, "did not set prefix"); report_prefix_pop(); @@ -327,7 +390,7 @@ static void test_set_prefix(void) install_page(root, virt_to_pte_phys(root, pagebuf), 0); set_prefix_key_1((uint32_t *)0); install_page(root, 0, 0); - check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PROTECTION); + check_key_prot_exc(ACC_FETCH, PROT_FETCH_STORE); report(get_prefix() == old_prefix, "did not set prefix"); report_prefix_pop(); @@ -351,7 +414,7 @@ static void test_set_prefix(void) install_page(root, virt_to_pte_phys(root, pagebuf), 0); set_prefix_key_1((uint32_t *)&mem_all[2048]); install_page(root, 0, 0); - check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PROTECTION); + check_key_prot_exc(ACC_FETCH, PROT_FETCH_STORE); report(get_prefix() == old_prefix, "did not set prefix"); report_prefix_pop(); -- 2.33.1