Re: [PATCH v11 19/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD

Alex Williamson
2023-05-23T15:52:18Z

On Tue, 23 May 2023 01:41:36 +0000
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:

> > From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 6:01 AM
> >
> > On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:28:23 -0700
> > Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This adds ioctl for userspace to bind device cdev fd to iommufd.
> > >
> > > VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD: bind device to an iommufd, hence gain DMA
> > > control provided by the iommufd. open_device
> > > op is called after bind_iommufd op.
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
> > > Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > drivers/vfio/vfio.h | 13 ++++
> > > drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 5 ++
> > > include/linux/vfio.h | 3 +-
> > > include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 28 ++++++++
> > > 5 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > > index 1c640016a824..291cc678a18b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> > > * Copyright (c) 2023 Intel Corporation.
> > > */
> > > #include <linux/vfio.h>
> > > +#include <linux/iommufd.h>
> > >
> > > #include "vfio.h"
> > >
> > > @@ -44,6 +45,135 @@ int vfio_device_fops_cdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct
> > file *filep)
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> > > +{
> > > + spin_lock(&df->kvm_ref_lock);
> > > + if (df->kvm)
> > > + _vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(df->device, df->kvm);
> > > + spin_unlock(&df->kvm_ref_lock);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +void vfio_device_cdev_close(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> > > +{
> > > + struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * In the time of close, there is no contention with another one
> > > + * changing this flag. So read df->access_granted without lock
> > > + * and no smp_load_acquire() is ok.
> > > + */
> > > + if (!df->access_granted)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > + vfio_device_close(df);
> > > + vfio_device_put_kvm(device);
> > > + iommufd_ctx_put(df->iommufd);
> > > + device->cdev_opened = false;
> > > + mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > + vfio_device_unblock_group(device);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static struct iommufd_ctx *vfio_get_iommufd_from_fd(int fd)
> > > +{
> > > + struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd;
> > > + struct fd f;
> > > +
> > > + f = fdget(fd);
> > > + if (!f.file)
> > > + return ERR_PTR(-EBADF);
> > > +
> > > + iommufd = iommufd_ctx_from_file(f.file);
> > > +
> > > + fdput(f);
> > > + return iommufd;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > + struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd __user *arg)
> > > +{
> > > + struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> > > + struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd bind;
> > > + unsigned long minsz;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + static_assert(__same_type(arg->out_devid, df->devid));
> > > +
> > > + minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd, out_devid);
> > > +
> > > + if (copy_from_user(&bind, arg, minsz))
> > > + return -EFAULT;
> > > +
> > > + if (bind.argsz < minsz || bind.flags || bind.iommufd < 0)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + /* BIND_IOMMUFD only allowed for cdev fds */
> > > + if (df->group)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(device) && !capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
> > > + return -EPERM;
> > > +
> > > + ret = vfio_device_block_group(device);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > + /* one device cannot be bound twice */
> > > + if (df->access_granted) {
> > > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > > + goto out_unlock;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + df->iommufd = vfio_get_iommufd_from_fd(bind.iommufd);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(df->iommufd)) {
> > > + ret = PTR_ERR(df->iommufd);
> > > + df->iommufd = NULL;
> > > + goto out_unlock;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Before the device open, get the KVM pointer currently
> > > + * associated with the device file (if there is) and obtain
> > > + * a reference. This reference is held until device closed.
> > > + * Save the pointer in the device for use by drivers.
> > > + */
> > > + vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(df);
> > > +
> > > + ret = vfio_device_open(df);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + goto out_put_kvm;
> > > +
> > > + ret = copy_to_user(&arg->out_devid, &df->devid,
> > > + sizeof(df->devid)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + goto out_close_device;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Paired with smp_load_acquire() in vfio_device_fops::ioctl/
> > > + * read/write/mmap
> > > + */
> > > + smp_store_release(&df->access_granted, true);
> > > + device->cdev_opened = true;
> > > + mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > +
> > > + if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(device))
> > > + dev_warn(device->dev, "noiommu device is bound to iommufd by user
> > "
> > > + "(%s:%d)\n", current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
> >
> > The noiommu kernel taint only happens in vfio_group_find_or_alloc(), so
> > how does noiommu taint the kernel when !CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP?
>
> Yeah, in the cdev path, no taint. I add this just in order to par with the below
> message in the group path.
>
> vfio_device_open_file()
> {
> dev_warn(device->dev, "vfio-noiommu device opened by user "
> "(%s:%d)\n", current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
> }

There needs to be a taint when VFIO_GROUP is disabled. Thanks,

Alex

> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > +out_close_device:
> > > + vfio_device_close(df);
> > > +out_put_kvm:
> > > + vfio_device_put_kvm(device);
> > > + iommufd_ctx_put(df->iommufd);
> > > + df->iommufd = NULL;
> > > +out_unlock:
> > > + mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > + vfio_device_unblock_group(device);
> > > + return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static char *vfio_device_devnode(const struct device *dev, umode_t *mode)
> > > {
> > > return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "vfio/devices/%s", dev_name(dev));
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > > index 6861f8ebb64d..8b359a7794be 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > > @@ -279,6 +279,9 @@ static inline void vfio_device_del(struct vfio_device *device)
> > >
> > > void vfio_init_device_cdev(struct vfio_device *device);
> > > int vfio_device_fops_cdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep);
> > > +void vfio_device_cdev_close(struct vfio_device_file *df);
> > > +long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > + struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd __user *arg);
> > > int vfio_cdev_init(struct class *device_class);
> > > void vfio_cdev_cleanup(void);
> > > #else
> > > @@ -302,6 +305,16 @@ static inline int vfio_device_fops_cdev_open(struct inode
> > *inode,
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static inline void vfio_device_cdev_close(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> > > +{
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > + struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd
> > __user *arg)
> > > +{
> > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static inline int vfio_cdev_init(struct class *device_class)
> > > {
> > > return 0;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > > index c87cc7afe92c..c9fa39ac4b02 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > > @@ -574,6 +574,8 @@ static int vfio_device_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct
> > file *filep)
> > >
> > > if (df->group)
> > > vfio_device_group_close(df);
> > > + else
> > > + vfio_device_cdev_close(df);
> > >
> > > vfio_device_put_registration(device);
> > >
> > > @@ -1147,6 +1149,9 @@ static long vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl(struct file *filep,
> > > struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > + if (cmd == VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD)
> > > + return vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(df, (void __user *)arg);
> > > +
> > > /* Paired with smp_store_release() following vfio_device_open() */
> > > if (!smp_load_acquire(&df->access_granted))
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
> > > index 873275419f13..cf9d082a623c 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/vfio.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
> > > @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ struct vfio_device {
> > > struct iommufd_device *iommufd_device;
> > > bool iommufd_attached;
> > > #endif
> > > + bool cdev_opened:1;
> > > };
> > >
> > > /**
> > > @@ -169,7 +170,7 @@ vfio_iommufd_physical_devid(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> > >
> > > static inline bool vfio_device_cdev_opened(struct vfio_device *device)
> > > {
> > > - return false;
> > > + return device->cdev_opened;
> > > }
> > >
> > > /**
> > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > > index 24858b650562..07c917de31e9 100644
> > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > > @@ -194,6 +194,34 @@ struct vfio_group_status {
> > >
> > > /* --------------- IOCTLs for DEVICE file descriptors --------------- */
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD - _IOR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 19,
> > > + * struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd)
> > > + *
> > > + * Bind a vfio_device to the specified iommufd.
> > > + *
> > > + * User is restricted from accessing the device before the binding operation
> > > + * is completed.
> > > + *
> > > + * Unbind is automatically conducted when device fd is closed.
> > > + *
> > > + * @argsz: User filled size of this data.
> > > + * @flags: Must be 0.
> > > + * @iommufd: iommufd to bind.
> > > + * @out_devid: The device id generated by this bind. devid is a handle for
> > > + * this device/iommufd bond and can be used in IOMMUFD commands.
> > > + *
> > > + * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
> > > + */
> > > +struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd {
> > > + __u32 argsz;
> > > + __u32 flags;
> > > + __s32 iommufd;
> > > + __u32 out_devid;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +#define VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 19)
> > > +
> >
> > Why is this preempting the first device ioctl below rather than being
> > added in sequential order? I'm also not sure what's at device ioctl 18
> > that we started at 19. VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE is at 17. Yes, they're
> > hard to keep track of. Thanks,
>
> yes, 17 is the last occupied ioctl offset on device fd. Will correct
> it.
>
> Regards,
> Yi Liu
>