Re: [PATCH v11 20/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_[AT|DE]TACH_IOMMUFD_PT

Alex Williamson
2023-05-23T15:51:19Z

On Tue, 23 May 2023 01:20:17 +0000
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:

> > From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 6:16 AM
> >
> > On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:28:24 -0700
> > Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This adds ioctl for userspace to attach device cdev fd to and detach
> > > from IOAS/hw_pagetable managed by iommufd.
> > >
> > > VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT: attach vfio device to IOAS, hw_pagetable
> > > managed by iommufd. Attach can be
> > > undo by VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT
> > > or device fd close.
> > > VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT: detach vfio device from the current attached
> > > IOAS or hw_pagetable managed by iommufd.
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
> > > Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > drivers/vfio/iommufd.c | 18 +++++++++++
> > > drivers/vfio/vfio.h | 18 +++++++++++
> > > drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 8 +++++
> > > include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 5 files changed, 162 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > > index 291cc678a18b..3f14edb80a93 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > > @@ -174,6 +174,72 @@ long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file
> > *df,
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +int vfio_ioctl_device_attach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > + struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt __user *arg)
> > > +{
> > > + struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> > > + struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt attach;
> > > + unsigned long minsz;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt, pt_id);
> > > +
> > > + if (copy_from_user(&attach, arg, minsz))
> > > + return -EFAULT;
> > > +
> > > + if (attach.argsz < minsz || attach.flags)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + /* ATTACH only allowed for cdev fds */
> > > + if (df->group)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > + ret = vfio_iommufd_attach(device, &attach.pt_id);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + goto out_unlock;
> > > +
> > > + ret = copy_to_user(&arg->pt_id, &attach.pt_id,
> > > + sizeof(attach.pt_id)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + goto out_detach;
> > > + mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > +out_detach:
> > > + vfio_iommufd_detach(device);
> > > +out_unlock:
> > > + mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > + return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int vfio_ioctl_device_detach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > + struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt __user *arg)
> > > +{
> > > + struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> > > + struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt detach;
> > > + unsigned long minsz;
> > > +
> > > + minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt, flags);
> > > +
> > > + if (copy_from_user(&detach, arg, minsz))
> > > + return -EFAULT;
> > > +
> > > + if (detach.argsz < minsz || detach.flags)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + /* DETACH only allowed for cdev fds */
> > > + if (df->group)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > + vfio_iommufd_detach(device);
> > > + mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static char *vfio_device_devnode(const struct device *dev, umode_t *mode)
> > > {
> > > return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "vfio/devices/%s", dev_name(dev));
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > index 83575b65ea01..799ea322a7d4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > @@ -112,6 +112,24 @@ void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> > > vdev->ops->unbind_iommufd(vdev);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +int vfio_iommufd_attach(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)
> > > +{
> > > + lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> > > +
> > > + if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
> > > + return 0;
> >
> > Isn't this an invalid operation for a noiommu cdev, ie. -EINVAL? We
> > return success and copy back the provided pt_id, why would a user not
> > consider it a bug that they can't use whatever value was there with
> > iommufd?
>
> Yes, this is the question I asked in [1]. At that time, it appears to me
> that better to allow it [2]. Maybe it's more suitable to ask it here.

From an API perspective it seems wrong. We return success without
doing anything. A user would be right to consider it a bug that the
attach operation works but there's not actually any association to the
IOAS. Thanks,

Alex

> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/c203f11f-4d9f-cf43-03ab-e41a858bdd92@intel.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/ZFFUyhqID+LtUB%2FD@nvidia.com/
>
> > > +
> > > + return vdev->ops->attach_ioas(vdev, pt_id);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +void vfio_iommufd_detach(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> > > +{
> > > + lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> > > +
> > > + if (!vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
> > > + vdev->ops->detach_ioas(vdev);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > struct iommufd_ctx *vfio_iommufd_physical_ictx(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> > > {
> > > if (vdev->iommufd_device)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > > index 8b359a7794be..50553f67600f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > > @@ -241,6 +241,8 @@ int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device_file *df);
> > > void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device_file *df);
> > > int vfio_iommufd_compat_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *device,
> > > struct iommufd_ctx *ictx);
> > > +int vfio_iommufd_attach(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id);
> > > +void vfio_iommufd_detach(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> > > #else
> > > static inline int
> > > vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device,
> > > @@ -282,6 +284,10 @@ int vfio_device_fops_cdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct
> > file *filep);
> > > void vfio_device_cdev_close(struct vfio_device_file *df);
> > > long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd __user *arg);
> > > +int vfio_ioctl_device_attach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > + struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt __user *arg);
> > > +int vfio_ioctl_device_detach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > + struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt __user *arg);
> > > int vfio_cdev_init(struct class *device_class);
> > > void vfio_cdev_cleanup(void);
> > > #else
> > > @@ -315,6 +321,18 @@ static inline long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct
> > vfio_device_file *df,
> > > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static inline int vfio_ioctl_device_attach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > + struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt __user
> > *arg)
> > > +{
> > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline int vfio_ioctl_device_detach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > + struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt
> > __user *arg)
> > > +{
> > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static inline int vfio_cdev_init(struct class *device_class)
> > > {
> > > return 0;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > > index c9fa39ac4b02..8c3f26b4929b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > > @@ -1165,6 +1165,14 @@ static long vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl(struct file *filep,
> > > ret = vfio_ioctl_device_feature(device, (void __user *)arg);
> > > break;
> > >
> > > + case VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT:
> > > + ret = vfio_ioctl_device_attach(df, (void __user *)arg);
> > > + break;
> > > +
> > > + case VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT:
> > > + ret = vfio_ioctl_device_detach(df, (void __user *)arg);
> > > + break;
> > > +
> > > default:
> > > if (unlikely(!device->ops->ioctl))
> > > ret = -EINVAL;
> > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > > index 07c917de31e9..770f5f949929 100644
> > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > > @@ -222,6 +222,58 @@ struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd {
> > >
> > > #define VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 19)
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT - _IOW(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 20,
> > > + * struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt)
> > > + *
> > > + * Attach a vfio device to an iommufd address space specified by IOAS
> > > + * id or hw_pagetable (hwpt) id.
> > > + *
> > > + * Available only after a device has been bound to iommufd via
> > > + * VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD
> > > + *
> > > + * Undo by VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT or device fd close.
> > > + *
> > > + * @argsz: User filled size of this data.
> > > + * @flags: Must be 0.
> > > + * @pt_id: Input the target id which can represent an ioas or a hwpt
> > > + * allocated via iommufd subsystem.
> > > + * Output the input ioas id or the attached hwpt id which could
> > > + * be the specified hwpt itself or a hwpt automatically created
> > > + * for the specified ioas by kernel during the attachment.
> > > + *
> > > + * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
> > > + */
> > > +struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt {
> > > + __u32 argsz;
> > > + __u32 flags;
> > > + __u32 pt_id;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +#define VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT _IO(VFIO_TYPE,
> > VFIO_BASE + 20)
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT - _IOW(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 21,
> > > + * struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt)
> > > + *
> > > + * Detach a vfio device from the iommufd address space it has been
> > > + * attached to. After it, device should be in a blocking DMA state.
> > > + *
> > > + * Available only after a device has been bound to iommufd via
> > > + * VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD.
> >
> > These "[a]vailable only after" comments are meaningless, if the user
> > has the file descriptor the ioctl is available. We can say that ATTACH
> > should be used after BIND to associate the device with an address space
> > within the bound iommufd and DETACH removes that association, but the
> > user is welcome to call everything in the wrong order and we need to be
> > prepared for that anyway. Thanks,
>
> Oh, yes. it's available as long as FD is got. But it is expected to fail if
> the order is not met. This should be what the comment really wants
> to deliver. Will have a look at other ioctls as well.
>
> Regards,
> Yi Liu
>
> >
> > Alex
> >
> > > + *
> > > + * @argsz: User filled size of this data.
> > > + * @flags: Must be 0.
> > > + *
> > > + * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
> > > + */
> > > +struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt {
> > > + __u32 argsz;
> > > + __u32 flags;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +#define VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT _IO(VFIO_TYPE,
> > VFIO_BASE + 21)
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * VFIO_DEVICE_GET_INFO - _IOR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 7,
> > > * struct vfio_device_info)
>