From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7B2413398C; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 16:49:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.11.211 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708015795; cv=none; b=CBo2edYnk4MnSuRK8IKoFliavQJHp+mIEoJ8zUko1pJ7nUeCDuxBCuXb22xNAVynlLyX9GyBFF/NlYVJv4FYCBSUVq90B4A+cFUYCQ0xJRnn63x1HS71nSHrdGbcp5BSECse7agYLYPqd/r1+gOcTy1QP1aLd3LzmcerZ8qkjNk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708015795; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TE3D8fpad8zNmWgzvvTXnh84sY8vAJE16zBniS9sU/E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ESvPHIw7QxDldU1Sx/gOwnWyls9HglKQRvrhDjNDcihJgAyOSLnBH05PS2QiMH9ArOoC71ff24BAjinPpvMR2Uy1M/v/FQ3TKbh9LUUDtmVjuhaojoBizCCW7cQtiyHuJqsYf/ufAEBFdcXeHsXpfc4BJgZ/j0x8UayLQxJvgag= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.11.211 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id CE1C468B05; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 17:49:42 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 17:49:42 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ulf Hansson Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Richard Weinberger , Anton Ivanov , Johannes Berg , Justin Sanders , Denis Efremov , Josef Bacik , Geoff Levand , Ilya Dryomov , "Md. Haris Iqbal" , Jack Wang , Ming Lei , Maxim Levitsky , Alex Dubov , Miquel Raynal , Vignesh Raghavendra , Vineeth Vijayan , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, nbd@other.debian.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/17] mmc: pass queue_limits to blk_mq_alloc_disk Message-ID: <20240215164942.GA19722@lst.de> References: <20240215070300.2200308-1-hch@lst.de> <20240215070300.2200308-18-hch@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 05:40:37PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > Looks like $subject patch, patch11 and patch12 have already been > queued up as they are cooking linux-next. Normally I prefer to funnel > these via my mmc tree, to avoid potential conflicts (mostly for mmc, > where more active developments are ongoing). None of this is in my fresh linux-next pull, which would be rather surprising anyway as I've just sent them out and Jens isn't that quick to merge unreviewed series :) That being said it depends on prep patches in the block tree and thus I'd prefer merging this entire series through that tree.