From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.190]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9BB92BD1C for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 07:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.190 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712044411; cv=none; b=S71BiMFnprDwRHYgfl5zSRzldDWOfT+8+w7PT/UEqzEkg5eEcAZ8+2HS70APGZUEBs3FArHuha1nbyRurEBxpguQpac1esSAqRotpQvyIjc8k6ooQpk7t7aqma6Urh23oPZOUKFBOg07YyVVNg3XS0aGQdWQb5eJMGISizvWIYg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712044411; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Y4j6W4b2nsvuYc7NSGeH63FNbh0Qhm3lJgZNwtatPSc=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Np0BInQcau7DVnTJOIn2vrKM8KRjddxX73JMzLpkxu9RWe+oY1SPjaoOyaQCzjrS+2magiN5seC5ZRkr75ZuMjOF/vCNnoB3NTCeTtzaE/C8uFY0ygGYeyHovMnOIFWn8fmdXqB4+7PAIrGIs19/N7axUzbGUGK2wOhAiLJGl7g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.190 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.214]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V80Rc70dCz29kHr; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 15:50:36 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm100001.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.93]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B81221A016C; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 15:53:21 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.175.112.125) by dggpemm100001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.93) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 15:53:20 +0800 From: Kefeng Wang To: CC: Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , Christophe Leroy , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Alexander Gordeev , Gerald Schaefer , Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , , , , , , , Kefeng Wang Subject: [PATCH 7/7] x86: mm: accelerate pagefault when badaccess Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 15:51:42 +0800 Message-ID: <20240402075142.196265-8-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20240402075142.196265-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> References: <20240402075142.196265-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To dggpemm100001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.93) The vm_flags of vma already checked under per-VMA lock, if it is a bad access, directly handle error and return, there is no need to lock_mm_and_find_vma() and check vm_flags again. Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang --- arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c index a4cc20d0036d..67b18adc75dd 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c @@ -866,14 +866,17 @@ bad_area_nosemaphore(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, static void __bad_area(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, - unsigned long address, u32 pkey, int si_code) + unsigned long address, struct mm_struct *mm, + struct vm_area_struct *vma, u32 pkey, int si_code) { - struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm; /* * Something tried to access memory that isn't in our memory map.. * Fix it, but check if it's kernel or user first.. */ - mmap_read_unlock(mm); + if (mm) + mmap_read_unlock(mm); + else + vma_end_read(vma); __bad_area_nosemaphore(regs, error_code, address, pkey, si_code); } @@ -897,7 +900,8 @@ static inline bool bad_area_access_from_pkeys(unsigned long error_code, static noinline void bad_area_access_error(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, - unsigned long address, struct vm_area_struct *vma) + unsigned long address, struct mm_struct *mm, + struct vm_area_struct *vma) { /* * This OSPKE check is not strictly necessary at runtime. @@ -927,9 +931,9 @@ bad_area_access_error(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, */ u32 pkey = vma_pkey(vma); - __bad_area(regs, error_code, address, pkey, SEGV_PKUERR); + __bad_area(regs, error_code, address, mm, vma, pkey, SEGV_PKUERR); } else { - __bad_area(regs, error_code, address, 0, SEGV_ACCERR); + __bad_area(regs, error_code, address, mm, vma, 0, SEGV_ACCERR); } } @@ -1357,8 +1361,9 @@ void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, goto lock_mmap; if (unlikely(access_error(error_code, vma))) { - vma_end_read(vma); - goto lock_mmap; + bad_area_access_error(regs, error_code, address, NULL, vma); + count_vm_vma_lock_event(VMA_LOCK_SUCCESS); + return; } fault = handle_mm_fault(vma, address, flags | FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK, regs); if (!(fault & (VM_FAULT_RETRY | VM_FAULT_COMPLETED))) @@ -1394,7 +1399,7 @@ void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, * we can handle it.. */ if (unlikely(access_error(error_code, vma))) { - bad_area_access_error(regs, error_code, address, vma); + bad_area_access_error(regs, error_code, address, mm, vma); return; } -- 2.27.0