Re: [PATCH 02/17] MIPS: sgi-ip27: make NODE_DATA() the same as on all other architectures

Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-19T14:38:56Z

On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 16:32:59 +0200
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 16.07.24 13:13, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>
> >
> > sgi-ip27 is the only system that defines NODE_DATA() differently than
> > the rest of NUMA machines.
> >
> > Add node_data array of struct pglist pointers that will point to
> > __node_data[node]->pglist and redefine NODE_DATA() to use node_data
> > array.
> >
> > This will allow pulling declaration of node_data to the generic mm code
> > in the next commit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/mmzone.h | 5 ++++-
> > arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-memory.c | 5 ++++-
> > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/mmzone.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/mmzone.h
> > index 08c36e50a860..629c3f290203 100644
> > --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/mmzone.h
> > +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/mmzone.h
> > @@ -22,7 +22,10 @@ struct node_data {
> >
> > extern struct node_data *__node_data[];
> >
> > -#define NODE_DATA(n) (&__node_data[(n)]->pglist)
> > #define hub_data(n) (&__node_data[(n)]->hub)
> >
> > +extern struct pglist_data *node_data[];
> > +
> > +#define NODE_DATA(nid) (node_data[nid])
> > +
> > #endif /* _ASM_MACH_MMZONE_H */
> > diff --git a/arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-memory.c b/arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-memory.c
> > index b8ca94cfb4fe..c30ef6958b97 100644
> > --- a/arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-memory.c
> > +++ b/arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-memory.c
> > @@ -34,8 +34,10 @@
> > #define SLOT_PFNSHIFT (SLOT_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
> > #define PFN_NASIDSHFT (NASID_SHFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
> >
> > -struct node_data *__node_data[MAX_NUMNODES];
> > +struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES];
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(node_data);
> >
> > +struct node_data *__node_data[MAX_NUMNODES];
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__node_data);
> >
> > static u64 gen_region_mask(void)
> > @@ -361,6 +363,7 @@ static void __init node_mem_init(nasid_t node)
> > */
> > __node_data[node] = __va(slot_freepfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
> > memset(__node_data[node], 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> > + node_data[node] = &__node_data[node]->pglist;
> >
> > NODE_DATA(node)->node_start_pfn = start_pfn;
> > NODE_DATA(node)->node_spanned_pages = end_pfn - start_pfn;
>
> I was assuming we could get rid of __node_data->pglist.
>
> But now I am confused where that is actually set.

It looks nasty... Cast in arch_refresh_nodedata() takes
incoming pg_data_t * and casts it to the local version of
struct node_data * which I think is this one

struct node_data {
struct pglist_data pglist; (which is pg_data_t pglist)
struct hub_data hub;
};

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10/source/arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-memory.c#L432

Now that pg_data_t is allocated by
arch_alloc_nodedata() which might be fine (though types could be handled in a more
readable fashion via some container_of() magic.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10/source/arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-memory.c#L427

However that call is:
pg_data_t * __init arch_alloc_nodedata(int nid)
{
return memblock_alloc(sizeof(pg_data_t), SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
}

So doesn't seem to allocate enough space to me as should be sizeof(struct node_data)

Worth cleaning up whilst here? Proper handling of types would definitely
help.

Jonathan

>
> Anyhow
>
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>