From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A04AB34A311 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 20:07:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755806868; cv=none; b=CLas+p8qNCvCwAkkuALiu3Wg+HJLXqKmLZmEMISCgbQCJg1cw7aTsUils1oTRNyBTg3PJACMzckp41GRUcjLhcCCYqm4unHzJa78kWECMpTNHDNcKGh0bxdSgduPnmCx0rygOrcPxkoRpTEp6RLsf2vftLjUQqmHE7LlipJq39g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755806868; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EbcdXL10oBVSBHmjJHKvKh3MpEtOuUSNb7Ges4yPKyE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=b9+TRds2RxOojJ7OieoPel2rP74oNYx6yXp6AbjYn7pmDthWlz5Lu9BlISVbNlT6L3PgOLmKR164r/QydqohJqdVOSF8aN7f8lXlOciIjXQPcQVWnldaV+IT0ujn5rRFlsm3jeuJYPfxC5CS7+PE1S3EaNIaJX9ghNmg+VPXzz0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=Q1/E+adV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Q1/E+adV" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1755806863; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=S+ehuLujhp6/6Ui8/ETipqTmnVB5w2txW2o3jJCUzuY=; b=Q1/E+adVuYX8JC6nYgeVB8Co1OcJGSTX8sUUSbsngZ+Kelsz7Cg/w2rq3awMe1NECnRqqO p8HnNG+spMUhqyjsvz2fqBoqH4Oy3OdDQBZoNqsWLlY0TC+W/dDyEZfGRqNLx/oCxrcgyx w8AooxSq2F2gaUn1JzljIx7zFagxlaE= Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-463-tHt2LWqQODK0eqxoO6S4cQ-1; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 16:07:41 -0400 X-MC-Unique: tHt2LWqQODK0eqxoO6S4cQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: tHt2LWqQODK0eqxoO6S4cQ_1755806861 Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-45a1b00149cso6294595e9.0 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 13:07:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1755806860; x=1756411660; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=S+ehuLujhp6/6Ui8/ETipqTmnVB5w2txW2o3jJCUzuY=; b=DPRVvi3ZF/RLwLQoL4ljV40lyuOhPtg1u80JlgJX2GVdqAXZ2oc6tfg/PlHGHOJ5+h eO9ElsDBp9qwA30WBwbUjrnjsA7mu047h23toNCftpv2a3kGEjyGZRoMEj/J/izcVKyA B5U0Z/CU+m6BthqsHrvEeG7LRqVyJKZVflvTgfqW0HB9TTMzBwpb1JQbgcNdE0IbV5ax 47wO6N8zmVujf37tBb1SOnfkjCOcISApfpzFXl/rhGzhwosXnBelIa6cgVDNu8AKe0vi /Oo3RurA75G2Wdj56rUtIQcV7J/WQdYDN2k6DnrVOjuycP2M930Yv9YEl9B/UUwhjm0j gkxw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUAwcH1kW+ELQWriXRQnQVcoBmljWg6HBEtHpYCj9pVO7GgN1rZ7wSu3O/WnYRAGqmPDa/9pi0csHVU@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy9gA82b6PHPbJnd2EqeQgAlQUtWkR+WOreJB/nJZbUao/3Ywxv rzP0+6o0VJ4pI5m42RUSKA+RaawOmVqxGE0nxB4HN10EN5o8oS3ctaC0+l6rmUmS6O7JcNegxAH cUmDoFSpfvIvmREoxbcQMbzfPRyfh/C89ZM/wKFqch6GNiwyqBuFo0RedPIhk1e0= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuEcd17NsUHYNjH45hEsIf9e+0trQYHS9oUSy3/mp4MWB2LLplC/DZD9jbrhNg IREl3tNnBl+CYf1VIpSYeMA9e/C72JGXcXdj07hxx0XocPglZuwvww79eOVdC148SNV1aplqKT5 S2A3r1/JSQFg0Qe1QxcZbprurQ85W06z3D7o6H/s+aWjn0MFsYQ64mC+Iy0Gf9K1YJ0/h505bKO w1T+1ho/mVoY5oehAjDomjLXnUt+0yN1yT5chkGoyRRW/8/97njdOtiOpdcyNT0GNX8sPSMT0RM IyjL6TX5nBgPCPWDdiu+0NsJcSnrExNtTqFESdxsqqkej+S2KaNrIARBAlRMi2HW5sWalo2mDRL /nq53Jcv+YJJZ+BY8NLhCTw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:19cd:b0:458:be62:dcd3 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-45b517c2fc0mr3573045e9.17.1755806860557; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 13:07:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGrtwXyk8M0MMGhBsDq6sn2/zjKB5pcui5JGSP2GUX5VAX4EhNVsrp5ZVJRMStvpa9W7AdEeg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:19cd:b0:458:be62:dcd3 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-45b517c2fc0mr3572545e9.17.1755806860106; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 13:07:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (p200300d82f26ba0008036ec5991806fd.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:d8:2f26:ba00:803:6ec5:9918:6fd]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-45b50e3a52bsm8600375e9.21.2025.08.21.13.07.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Aug 2025 13:07:39 -0700 (PDT) From: David Hildenbrand To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: David Hildenbrand , Alexander Potapenko , Andrew Morton , Brendan Jackman , Christoph Lameter , Dennis Zhou , Dmitry Vyukov , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe , Jens Axboe , Johannes Weiner , John Hubbard , kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Liam R. Howlett" , Linus Torvalds , linux-arm-kernel@axis.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Lorenzo Stoakes , Marco Elver , Marek Szyprowski , Michal Hocko , Mike Rapoport , Muchun Song , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Oscar Salvador , Peter Xu , Robin Murphy , Suren Baghdasaryan , Tejun Heo , virtualization@lists.linux.dev, Vlastimil Babka , wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com, x86@kernel.org, Zi Yan Subject: [PATCH RFC 12/35] mm: limit folio/compound page sizes in problematic kernel configs Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 22:06:38 +0200 Message-ID: <20250821200701.1329277-13-david@redhat.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.50.1 In-Reply-To: <20250821200701.1329277-1-david@redhat.com> References: <20250821200701.1329277-1-david@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Let's limit the maximum folio size in problematic kernel config where the memmap is allocated per memory section (SPARSEMEM without SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) to a single memory section. Currently, only a single architectures supports ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE but not SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP: sh. Fortunately, the biggest hugetlb size sh supports is 64 MiB (HUGETLB_PAGE_SIZE_64MB) and the section size is at least 64 MiB (SECTION_SIZE_BITS == 26), so their use case is not degraded. As folios and memory sections are naturally aligned to their order-2 size in memory, consequently a single folio can no longer span multiple memory sections on these problematic kernel configs. nth_page() is no longer required when operating within a single compound page / folio. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand --- include/linux/mm.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index 77737cbf2216a..48a985e17ef4e 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -2053,11 +2053,25 @@ static inline long folio_nr_pages(const struct folio *folio) return folio_large_nr_pages(folio); } -/* Only hugetlbfs can allocate folios larger than MAX_ORDER */ -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE -#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER PUD_ORDER -#else +#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE) +/* + * We don't expect any folios that exceed buddy sizes (and consequently + * memory sections). + */ #define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER MAX_PAGE_ORDER +#elif defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM) && !defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) +/* + * Only pages within a single memory section are guaranteed to be + * contiguous. By limiting folios to a single memory section, all folio + * pages are guaranteed to be contiguous. + */ +#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER PFN_SECTION_SHIFT +#else +/* + * There is no real limit on the folio size. We limit them to the maximum we + * currently expect. + */ +#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER PUD_ORDER #endif #define MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES (1UL << MAX_FOLIO_ORDER) -- 2.50.1