From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, balbirs@nvidia.com,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
airlied@gmail.com, apopple@nvidia.com, baohua@kernel.org,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, byungchul@sk.com, dakr@kernel.org,
dev.jain@arm.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
francois.dugast@intel.com, gourry@gourry.net,
joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, lyude@redhat.com,
matthew.brost@intel.com, mpenttil@redhat.com, npache@redhat.com,
osalvador@suse.de, rakie.kim@sk.com, rcampbell@nvidia.com,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, simona@ffwll.ch,
ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
agordeev@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] KVM: s390: Fix missing present bit for gmap puds
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 11:20:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251029112033.23b3ee87@p-imbrenda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <db143076-afa0-4129-b5b0-eab85ec54aac@redhat.com>
On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 11:00:14 +0100
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 28.10.25 14:01, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> > For hugetlbs, gmap puds have the present bit set. For normal puds
> > (which point to ptes), the bit is not set. This is in contrast to the
> > normal userspace puds, which always have the bit set for present pmds.
> >
> > This causes issues when ___pte_offset_map() is modified to only check
> > for the present bit.
> >
> > The solution to the problem is simply to always set the present bit for
> > present gmap pmds.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251017144924.10034-1-borntraeger@linux.ibm.com/
> > Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
> > Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/s390/mm/gmap.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c b/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
> > index 8ff6bba107e8..22c448b32340 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
> > +++ b/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
> > @@ -599,8 +599,9 @@ int __gmap_link(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long gaddr, unsigned long vmaddr)
> > | _SEGMENT_ENTRY_GMAP_UC
> > | _SEGMENT_ENTRY;
> > } else
> > - *table = pmd_val(*pmd) &
> > - _SEGMENT_ENTRY_HARDWARE_BITS;
>
> I'd add a comment here like
>
> /* Make sure that pmd_present() will work on these entries. */
the whole file is going away very soon anyway
>
> > + *table = (pmd_val(*pmd) &
> > + _SEGMENT_ENTRY_HARDWARE_BITS)
> > + | _SEGMENT_ENTRY;
> > }
> > } else if (*table & _SEGMENT_ENTRY_PROTECT &&
> > !(pmd_val(*pmd) & _SEGMENT_ENTRY_PROTECT)) {
>
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-29 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20251001065707.920170-4-balbirs@nvidia.com>
2025-10-17 14:49 ` linux-next: KVM/s390x regression (was: [v7 03/16] mm/huge_memory: add device-private THP support to PMD operations) Christian Borntraeger
2025-10-17 14:54 ` linux-next: KVM/s390x regression David Hildenbrand
2025-10-17 15:01 ` Christian Borntraeger
2025-10-17 15:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-17 15:20 ` Christian Borntraeger
2025-10-17 17:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-17 21:56 ` Balbir Singh
2025-10-17 22:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-17 22:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-20 7:01 ` Christian Borntraeger
2025-10-20 7:00 ` Christian Borntraeger
2025-10-20 8:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-20 9:04 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2025-10-27 16:47 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2025-10-27 16:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-27 17:06 ` Christian Borntraeger
2025-10-28 9:24 ` Balbir Singh
2025-10-28 13:01 ` [PATCH v1 0/1] KVM: s390: Fix missing present bit for gmap puds Claudio Imbrenda
2025-10-28 13:01 ` [PATCH v1 1/1] " Claudio Imbrenda
2025-10-28 21:23 ` Balbir Singh
2025-10-29 10:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-29 10:20 ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2025-10-28 22:53 ` [PATCH v1 0/1] " Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251029112033.23b3ee87@p-imbrenda \
--to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=byungchul@sk.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=francois.dugast@intel.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mpenttil@redhat.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).