From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 768B6233136; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 14:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765378647; cv=none; b=hVqCSukY5MYNDMw8rGbulE2Tx3xGVylRGSmOkwH2tzeNwaqfCvIHzD7unEWmBle64WiOaYG4SfzjeP5F4lYZiRL1lWrBW+ySUNPRorlhVPNNCTkFIUKy35ofeNmbfJJaQHeFCMBs/pKwx/RSy/fUpMuhlXtmrN144xvwxMxwOPk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765378647; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KKUBTvciOckem/esns9/7wmXj+VeduqlXOe6AAiPFcQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=URr2K1cSiKYgKerzuyr/bhUB2luy1IdaCOvYTAlJZH6KctNw5UdXzX+xlRT/x9eAu+hMJbNA+ngzv5VGAEEXYDC3N8XNGDJdSMe0h95hZmdxWos5niJGpkNsuflKkgbjzmczZxY6TlQd+ZPbP3+8Pm+7C0dIbuOzk9ovPtNZc7Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=gExRL8aM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="gExRL8aM" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1765378646; x=1796914646; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=KKUBTvciOckem/esns9/7wmXj+VeduqlXOe6AAiPFcQ=; b=gExRL8aM7X1FQoEQ9EFMdQLI0dClcQ2oF8bs4ghR800df0u3vaVaC2G9 Tehn7gTNS0NlSJDsO/RRPzQUBrEra9A6NVuvxNG9edgjdosL4BgY4kzpY U206EXOWRmaNVzc67QMZxsm3tFQF5qbSg063Y7/wagvEeYd/yJgWICOni Hig9xhO5VyLr4QpET97tSU68D6LBDBSexgBub/HOw60eM0qcFifie2rjl /V2nUxliFbyGjvGSPjbhHtllWxnidhiT8MIfsp6g7uWVH9AZdnAMl8o5o ZmBKE7SxXxj7mvu0rWcJtTITSCFhXnEj5YYyZF6c7cn4CeFX0zQUHBQnp A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: WrFTJgEtRj+XTYgITzqmhw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Jd+huH5ZRbip95NgnUmGAg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11638"; a="67425683" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.20,264,1758610800"; d="scan'208";a="67425683" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by fmvoesa109.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Dec 2025 06:57:25 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: qYXTPD3WQM6TQ4nxwv3RJg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 9yPDEePCRoGBCAdf5sf0+A== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.20,264,1758610800"; d="scan'208";a="200963848" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO d335e3c6db51) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Dec 2025 06:57:21 -0800 Received: from kbuild by d335e3c6db51 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vTLd1-000000003IH-2BpZ; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 14:57:19 +0000 Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 22:57:02 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Heiko Carstens , Alexander Gordeev , Sven Schnelle , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , Peter Zijlstra , Mark Rutland , Arnd Bergmann , Jens Remus , Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus , Juergen Christ Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] s390/bug: Implement __WARN_printf() Message-ID: <202512102243.DTSqDkfQ-lkp@intel.com> References: <20251209121701.1856271-7-hca@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251209121701.1856271-7-hca@linux.ibm.com> Hi Heiko, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on 70075e3d0ca0b72cc983d03f7cd9796e43492980] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Heiko-Carstens/kbuild-Require-gcc-9-for-s390/20251209-202647 base: 70075e3d0ca0b72cc983d03f7cd9796e43492980 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251209121701.1856271-7-hca%40linux.ibm.com patch subject: [PATCH 6/9] s390/bug: Implement __WARN_printf() config: s390-randconfig-r062-20251210 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251210/202512102243.DTSqDkfQ-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251210/202512102243.DTSqDkfQ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512102243.DTSqDkfQ-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): arch/s390/kernel/traps.c:224:26: warning: 'struct arch_va_list' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration 224 | void *__warn_args(struct arch_va_list *args, struct pt_regs *regs) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/s390/kernel/traps.c:224:7: warning: no previous prototype for '__warn_args' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 224 | void *__warn_args(struct arch_va_list *args, struct pt_regs *regs) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ arch/s390/kernel/traps.c: In function '__warn_args': >> arch/s390/kernel/traps.c:243:13: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct arch_va_list' 243 | args->__overflow_arg_area = stack_frame + 1; | ^~ arch/s390/kernel/traps.c:244:13: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct arch_va_list' 244 | args->__reg_save_area = regs->gprs; | ^~ arch/s390/kernel/traps.c:245:13: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct arch_va_list' 245 | args->__gpr = 1; | ^~ vim +243 arch/s390/kernel/traps.c 223 > 224 void *__warn_args(struct arch_va_list *args, struct pt_regs *regs) 225 { 226 struct stack_frame *stack_frame; 227 228 /* 229 * Generate va_list from pt_regs. See ELF Application Binary Interface 230 * s390x Supplement documentation for details. 231 * 232 * - __overflow_arg_area needs to point to the parameter area, which 233 * is right above the standard stack frame (160 bytes) 234 * 235 * - __reg_save_area needs to point to a register save area where 236 * general registers (%r2 - %r6) can be found at offset 16. Which 237 * means that the gprs save area of pt_regs can be used 238 * 239 * - __gpr must be set to one, since the first parameter has been 240 * processed (pointer to bug_entry) 241 */ 242 stack_frame = (struct stack_frame *)regs->gprs[15]; > 243 args->__overflow_arg_area = stack_frame + 1; 244 args->__reg_save_area = regs->gprs; 245 args->__gpr = 1; 246 return args; 247 } 248 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki