From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] s390/stackleak: Fix __stackleak_poison() inline assembly constraint
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 14:35:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260302133500.1560531-4-hca@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260302133500.1560531-1-hca@linux.ibm.com>
The __stackleak_poison() inline assembly comes with a "count" operand where
the "d" constraint is used. "count" is used with the exrl instruction and
"d" means that the compiler may allocate any register from 0 to 15.
If the compiler would allocate register 0 then the exrl instruction would
not or the value of "count" into the executed instruction - resulting in a
stackframe which is only partially poisoned.
Use the correct "a" constraint, which excludes register 0 from register
allocation.
Fixes: 2a405f6bb3a5 ("s390/stackleak: provide fast __stackleak_poison() implementation")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h
index cc187afa07b3..78195ee5e99f 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static __always_inline void __stackleak_poison(unsigned long erase_low,
" j 4f\n"
"3: mvc 8(1,%[addr]),0(%[addr])\n"
"4:"
- : [addr] "+&a" (erase_low), [count] "+&d" (count), [tmp] "=&a" (tmp)
+ : [addr] "+&a" (erase_low), [count] "+&a" (count), [tmp] "=&a" (tmp)
: [poison] "d" (poison)
: "memory", "cc"
);
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-02 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-02 13:34 [PATCH 0/3] s390: Fix and improve inline assembly constraints Heiko Carstens
2026-03-02 13:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] s390/xor: Fix xor_xc_2() " Heiko Carstens
2026-03-02 15:41 ` Vasily Gorbik
2026-03-02 13:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] s390/xor: Improve " Heiko Carstens
2026-03-02 16:02 ` Vasily Gorbik
2026-03-02 13:35 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2026-03-02 15:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] s390/stackleak: Fix __stackleak_poison() inline assembly constraint Vasily Gorbik
2026-03-02 13:47 ` [PATCH 0/3] s390: Fix and improve inline assembly constraints Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-02 14:40 ` Heiko Carstens
2026-03-02 16:13 ` Vasily Gorbik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260302133500.1560531-4-hca@linux.ibm.com \
--to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox