[PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: s390: selftests: Add IRQ routing address offset tests

[Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>]

This test tries to setup routes which have address + offset
combinations which cross a page.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm      |  1 +
 .../testing/selftests/kvm/s390/irq_routing.c  | 75 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390/irq_routing.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
index fdec90e85467..271cbb63af36 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
@@ -205,6 +205,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390 += s390/ucontrol_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390 += s390/user_operexec
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390 += s390/keyop
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390 += rseq_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390 += s390/irq_routing
 
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv = $(TEST_GEN_PROGS_COMMON)
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += riscv/sbi_pmu_test
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390/irq_routing.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390/irq_routing.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7819a0af19a8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390/irq_routing.c
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * IRQ routing offset tests.
+ *
+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2026
+ *
+ * Authors:
+ *  Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
+ */
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <sys/ioctl.h>
+
+#include "test_util.h"
+#include "kvm_util.h"
+#include "kselftest.h"
+#include "ucall_common.h"
+
+extern char guest_code[];
+asm("guest_code:\n"
+    "diag %r0,%r0,0\n"
+    "j .\n");
+
+static void test(void)
+{
+	struct kvm_irq_routing *routing;
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+	struct kvm_vm *vm;
+	vm_paddr_t mem;
+	int ret;
+
+	struct kvm_irq_routing_entry ue = {
+		.type = KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_S390_ADAPTER,
+		.gsi = 1,
+	};
+
+	vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_code);
+	mem = vm_phy_pages_alloc(vm, 2, 4096 * 42, 0);
+
+	routing = kvm_gsi_routing_create();
+	routing->nr = 1;
+	routing->entries[0] = ue;
+	routing->entries[0].u.adapter.summary_addr = (uintptr_t)mem;
+	routing->entries[0].u.adapter.ind_addr = (uintptr_t)mem;
+
+	routing->entries[0].u.adapter.summary_offset = 4096 * 8;
+	ret = __vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING, routing);
+	ksft_test_result(ret == -1 && errno == EINVAL, "summary offset outside of page\n");
+
+	routing->entries[0].u.adapter.summary_offset -= 4;
+	ret = __vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING, routing);
+	ksft_test_result(ret == 0, "summary offset inside of page\n");
+
+	routing->entries[0].u.adapter.ind_offset = 4096 * 8;
+	ret = __vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING, routing);
+	ksft_test_result(ret == -1 && errno == EINVAL, "ind offset outside of page\n");
+
+	routing->entries[0].u.adapter.ind_offset -= 4;
+	ret = __vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING, routing);
+	ksft_test_result(ret == 0, "ind offset inside of page\n");
+
+	kvm_vm_free(vm);
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+	TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING));
+
+	ksft_print_header();
+	ksft_set_plan(4);
+	test();
+
+	ksft_finished();	/* Print results and exit() accordingly */
+}
-- 
2.51.0