public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Juergen Christ <jchrist@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 7/9] s390/percpu: Provide arch_this_cpu_read() implementation
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 20:54:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260317195436.2276810-8-hca@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260317195436.2276810-1-hca@linux.ibm.com>

Provide an s390 specific implementation of arch_this_cpu_read() instead
of the generic variant. The generic variant uses preempt_disable() /
preempt_enable() pair and READ_ONCE().

Get rid of the preempt_disable() / preempt_enable() pairs by providing an
own variant which makes use of the new percpu code section infrastructure.

With this the text size of the kernel image is reduced by ~1k
(defconfig). Also 87 generated preempt_schedule_notrace() function
calls within the kernel image (modules not counted) are removed.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/percpu.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/percpu.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/percpu.h
index f26f03b0889c..35e48d193d99 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/percpu.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/percpu.h
@@ -240,6 +240,37 @@
 
 #endif /* MARCH_HAS_Z196_FEATURES */
 
+#define arch_this_cpu_read(pcp, op)					\
+({									\
+	unsigned long lc_pcpr, lc_pcpo;					\
+	typedef typeof(pcp) pcp_op_T__;					\
+	pcp_op_T__ val__, *ptr__;					\
+									\
+	lc_pcpr = offsetof(struct lowcore, percpu_register);		\
+	lc_pcpo = offsetof(struct lowcore, percpu_offset);		\
+	ptr__ = &(pcp);							\
+	asm_inline volatile(						\
+		MVIY_PERCPU("%[disppcpr]", "%[dispaltpcpr]", "%[ptr__]")\
+		AG_ALT("%[disppcpo]", "%[dispaltpcpo]", "%[ptr__]")	\
+		op "	%[val__],0(%[ptr__])\n"				\
+		MVIY_ALT("%[disppcpr]", "%[dispaltpcpr]", "%%r0")	\
+		: [val__] "=&d" (val__), [ptr__] "+&a" (ptr__),		\
+		  "=m" (((struct lowcore *)0)->percpu_register)		\
+		: [disppcpr] "i" (lc_pcpr),				\
+		  [disppcpo] "i" (lc_pcpo),				\
+		  [dispaltpcpr] "i" (lc_pcpr + LOWCORE_ALT_ADDRESS),	\
+		  [dispaltpcpo] "i" (lc_pcpo + LOWCORE_ALT_ADDRESS),	\
+		  "m" (*ptr__),						\
+		  "m" (((struct lowcore *)0)->percpu_offset)		\
+		: "cc");						\
+	val__;								\
+})
+
+#define this_cpu_read_1(pcp) arch_this_cpu_read(pcp, "ic")
+#define this_cpu_read_2(pcp) arch_this_cpu_read(pcp, "lh")
+#define this_cpu_read_4(pcp) arch_this_cpu_read(pcp, "l")
+#define this_cpu_read_8(pcp) arch_this_cpu_read(pcp, "lg")
+
 #define arch_this_cpu_cmpxchg(pcp, oval, nval)				\
 ({									\
 	typedef typeof(pcp) pcp_op_T__;					\
-- 
2.51.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-17 19:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-17 19:54 [PATCH 0/9] s390: Improve this_cpu operations Heiko Carstens
2026-03-17 19:54 ` [PATCH 1/9] s390/percpu: Provide arch_raw_cpu_ptr() Heiko Carstens
2026-03-17 19:54 ` [PATCH 2/9] s390/alternatives: Add new ALT_TYPE_PERCPU type Heiko Carstens
2026-03-17 19:54 ` [PATCH 3/9] s390/percpu: Infrastructure for more efficient this_cpu operations Heiko Carstens
2026-03-17 19:54 ` [PATCH 4/9] s390/percpu: Use new percpu code section for arch_this_cpu_add() Heiko Carstens
2026-03-17 19:54 ` [PATCH 5/9] s390/percpu: Use new percpu code section for arch_this_cpu_add_return() Heiko Carstens
2026-03-17 19:54 ` [PATCH 6/9] s390/percpu: Use new percpu code section for arch_this_cpu_[and|or]() Heiko Carstens
2026-03-17 19:54 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2026-03-17 19:54 ` [PATCH 8/9] s390/percpu: Provide arch_this_cpu_write() implementation Heiko Carstens
2026-03-17 19:54 ` [PATCH 9/9] s390/percpu: Remove one and two byte this_cpu operation implementation Heiko Carstens
2026-03-17 21:08 ` [PATCH 0/9] s390: Improve this_cpu operations Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-23 10:26 ` Juergen Christ

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260317195436.2276810-8-hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jchrist@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox