public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Juergen Christ <jchrist@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] s390: Improve this_cpu operations
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 14:56:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260319135612.GI3738786@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260319120503.4046659-1-hca@linux.ibm.com>

On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 01:04:54PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> v2:
> 
> - Add proper PERCPU_PTR cast to most patches to avoid tons of sparse
>   warnings
> 
> - Add missing __packed attribute to insn structure [Sashiko [2]]
> 
> - Fix inverted if condition [Sashiko [2]]
> 
> - Add missing user_mode() check [Sashiko [2]]
> 
> - Move percpu_entry() call in front of irqentry_enter() call in all
>   entry paths to avoid that potential this_cpu() operations overwrite
>   the not-yet saved percpu code section indicator  [Sashiko [2]]

Would it make sense to add arch hooks to irqentry_{enter,exit}() ?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-19 13:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-19 12:04 [PATCH v2 0/9] s390: Improve this_cpu operations Heiko Carstens
2026-03-19 12:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] s390/percpu: Provide arch_raw_cpu_ptr() Heiko Carstens
2026-03-19 12:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] s390/alternatives: Add new ALT_TYPE_PERCPU type Heiko Carstens
2026-03-19 12:04 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] s390/percpu: Infrastructure for more efficient this_cpu operations Heiko Carstens
2026-03-19 12:04 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] s390/percpu: Use new percpu code section for arch_this_cpu_add() Heiko Carstens
2026-03-19 12:04 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] s390/percpu: Use new percpu code section for arch_this_cpu_add_return() Heiko Carstens
2026-03-19 12:05 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] s390/percpu: Use new percpu code section for arch_this_cpu_[and|or]() Heiko Carstens
2026-03-19 12:05 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] s390/percpu: Provide arch_this_cpu_read() implementation Heiko Carstens
2026-03-19 12:05 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] s390/percpu: Provide arch_this_cpu_write() implementation Heiko Carstens
2026-03-19 12:05 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] s390/percpu: Remove one and two byte this_cpu operation implementation Heiko Carstens
2026-03-19 13:56 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-03-20 11:39   ` [PATCH v2 0/9] s390: Improve this_cpu operations Heiko Carstens
2026-03-20 11:44     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260319135612.GI3738786@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jchrist@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox