From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qv1-f44.google.com (mail-qv1-f44.google.com [209.85.219.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 871A236E476 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2026 15:56:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.219.44 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774886215; cv=none; b=I1w33HovrzWOtLb1S46KzaSZ7hu+eY2Xjzu4bja0zCN/xlIrHr8wCls2NYwKU0rs5mIXHopZ/FIEhEgg/y/NnBPcgwikoEtaMDSluidQKLahlIWzbvrfmJUZRTHmF5RewxG1H6XFL1yqQGp/szt8gu+6wj7nW/Jl2RP/Kx2rZx4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774886215; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MvxaAIkc/vMbD2wvC/YxOU7JwZEPwJRXPevAKf4Yi4Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=bD7gcCO2miCHE4SV2xUcA6AnRI3Alj2TtBA64BN/BfYcdDvs7d3RMgkUhX8o0ckd7Vt1eKcZMCtdF5Is5Q54+Rn8tWnQryKtOuc4EMa/04mJOaFTXjfQ2JoJrsmMoXpg4KoNPNULemDaADte/Ye10UxZe5kXnhnf3I+TdLgoanM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ziepe.ca; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ziepe.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ziepe.ca header.i=@ziepe.ca header.b=J4bfIjOb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.219.44 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ziepe.ca Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ziepe.ca Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ziepe.ca header.i=@ziepe.ca header.b="J4bfIjOb" Received: by mail-qv1-f44.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-8a05c388b27so5121776d6.3 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2026 08:56:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; t=1774886213; x=1775491013; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HeZbDTptZg5lfUHxFUgvvXT20LbyuaUKO1YdEoXFrgs=; b=J4bfIjObsxswXFEH6G5gRmOuEYhC7Z/GfJgprhC/N560AJLgMRNrqlZM5KDuz2zeel QPCP1WK8I/C9uUutoV2Hr6tTdWwH6Oi5kPVnqzudJzaIMp+Mexuv+rHpvHyanmj1VXfq 56MAs1r2g6IqxIyVKXnigsvWiVZaleft7uJU1rj2+jXg9DumfpRw4cWJ8/OsFsKbuUvf 1yC9RKjJ9b0s0OLP316+HZWj0u3J9hLW5lzD1ab4S3l2aF2URWAgWSHNDilXawrHE7XY xIjEO3llrQ+0HFquDbbG/JkL2lQnln6kH5YSM9pDS3B81XcEkW335CXJitrBf4kI479K bNMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1774886213; x=1775491013; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HeZbDTptZg5lfUHxFUgvvXT20LbyuaUKO1YdEoXFrgs=; b=WWv7rxQK+zSwOQtGKrmL7O32Y1z2ePbelBEiGZYZMqOnvphd6B8iHjcWoLyujA2dEV rsuNpzmjHvNXzu2MUisCKvfphISRtGuTSEEOMrEX6gI1NDa2jgUJ+GDOAPmsbFB/K5fx Tx7UWBD10gLCBezkktbZIho8WGpOpXE3ndO0yliRpRmphc+As6JAhNv48s973GcSAh4y 8uk97NUJnzLH6wMekFimhhq+tp+PE3Jdat3JxQjTYvQepNRVxHiZzZVNWt2f5SVC7wP8 +nDagSSs9qOpS5yglvqtt4IRBzCVe2XLHnW/N1wkg8tbLUlaY2xRtR0CkPGdMT2DwwC/ whlA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUKjufVgccn2QQj5zzLoe6Nujm06nhc1/lFAmG0N331V/b/7nh/mhzcn8nZPIGCT7swPTOYCkzsTGxs@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy6b88Ew+7W2mRZ8fq7cJQrzw3Hk+urU6InG2TV1TX1NnpXScmS 5OWtTLWgEp7XX1fcPk2Mxy24hFIT8L89NHHgFyGqDq25UIJkMvTfioOeHIfHj+7fSgY= X-Gm-Gg: ATEYQzzO+UWxft+/XMbPvf2eX2NQJYqiKXS4OJMpt8gBAkjmm0wPFP0JCxTtUsdaADK 0F+IH6ADIG/5cQZ+GBHYOV1TIgFKDekuZDO5/M3wy4mHw37hVwFJgzox48fLMKWPvtXlJVqyUlI PTUSLBbgGkXIcTidbuC6tUhFQa/VBECQ3zohcXdsVytp9moaEmh9KD8RvQFEZfrsQJQ5tg1CW1+ gEg0lHyuB95xAbAiyKyRdXtOwNnTjbOFgw1Kp0BhJW4JbjIglu9KLg3d9qxCghTujyKWRiD6CJR IMACaLEl4ExaDzO/3RaQauLwRW9X44Qlqr5FsoUyYBL8wb/KYOjD9LmZnJwwRWtnLmjfhxkX3D3 IZ5+8jiZkoarhIbTDXcnYnH4KwRFGwCwV7E4155NfawfZLtY8HbPTwGGDFG1z+xeBSdIkDpfZjT bBEnhjSi0KFX0fDsa+w1QhpW0EncAcpflFOhc4q3IsNButMGjr9NitVy29VcNpQlpDNAhuVQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:4a05:b0:899:fab4:730f with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-89ce8e2a475mr188167876d6.49.1774886213420; Mon, 30 Mar 2026 08:56:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ziepe.ca (mctnnbsa70w-159-2-73-22.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net. [159.2.73.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6a1803df08f44-89ecf865ccesm66356736d6.39.2026.03.30.08.56.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 30 Mar 2026 08:56:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jgg by wakko with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1w7Eyx-00000003cgN-4AHM; Mon, 30 Mar 2026 12:56:52 -0300 Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 12:56:51 -0300 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Alex Williamson Cc: Niklas Schnelle , Farhan Ali , Julian Ruess , wintera@linux.ibm.com, ts@linux.ibm.com, oberpar@linux.ibm.com, gbayer@linux.ibm.com, Yishai Hadas , Shameer Kolothum , Kevin Tian , mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, raspl@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] vfio/ism: Implement vfio_pci driver for ISM devices Message-ID: <20260330155651.GD246076@ziepe.ca> References: <20260325-vfio_pci_ism-v8-0-ddc504cde914@linux.ibm.com> <20260325-vfio_pci_ism-v8-2-ddc504cde914@linux.ibm.com> <4096cb9d402b1aabc9667d450221cb0922e78d90.camel@linux.ibm.com> <3d6457b9-715a-4cbb-9c69-d8a7e7473c89@linux.ibm.com> <64e3158a441c79c55febead9aac956c31f034fb9.camel@linux.ibm.com> <20260330093646.03b0455f@shazbot.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260330093646.03b0455f@shazbot.org> On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 09:36:46AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > There's risk involved with changing the default shift. The fear is > there's userspace drivers that hard code the shift. DPDK was even such > a user at one point, iirc. Maybe it's ok to break such users, maybe > there are actually no such users left and it's all FUD at this point. > Either way, I have a hard time justifying that risk for a single, > obscure S390 device. If we go ahead with that DMABUF series could obscure cases like this be told to just get a DMABUF FD and then mmap it? Avoid this whole issue? Jason