From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAFA43E316B for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2026 09:09:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785143348; cv=none; b=nShnWEbenaZSE/YcXUji19V+GaA9xfJ1imlax+H5GSM4xEWDedtvRjA8h+jEqbGKD5sYJ3BfSvwUVJRiUM5bLcDvdOLA6B15McFadICo/+BbOLiA6FXgO2OA4CUNocEG54Ga+Ga9iommQ1A0M/BTweeFFQRyTUuw1Yn8MqDapDY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785143348; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0TpKgFlY2szm5UM/v29VJaSChnJmnH1VqAgxCb+VAjI=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=odcKBQzXSVdyWy7GFaCX/3LAy3qyAimBSE8Pj4Rg16/k5r3Zazih8fITqkDvQnBeP01LrVodCndPFa9YTzZHTGFF5OLMrg7xPkZUe88J9cyS6agdJdTtBPZH5XiiNx9j1+VCRwvg29Z7O2oaYwRWxOxU00icAkEIq7FYWfghr0c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=g8DbUQK+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="g8DbUQK+" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 238DB1F000E9; Mon, 27 Jul 2026 09:09:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785143347; bh=0TpKgFlY2szm5UM/v29VJaSChnJmnH1VqAgxCb+VAjI=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=g8DbUQK+KTfdXfx7SkshIvd9Hne67L6+u+Mg3cW0NYrFVFoP4QOp+9GZdbbj9nMhO OD7h6WL4KaOy7/LfUXHcnwzYyaryeNP5v+DBXqljNGyqENl+Bfqge44x0pgaEA9nu0 0cSVMdhKt4o3cm5qj4HLyORO7dKY16ORDwI9AOYdUfHi0Byy86QqqADHjGiC4EuORC Yo48U3EQDXzB1m5YoK3BChz9g8m2KnuMjzrQohtjnjQ3coZEqZje95ungpV8a4ZF/n fxMm4EM/kY+T5ttBCEiemzFd073R2MNjEl48G6KWZQ6YunuTQigVYRP3Eh2X2ShS4F cvVvY21M9hpCQ== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] panic: Introduce arch_do_panic Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Mete Durlu" Cc: "Alexander Gordeev" , "Heiko Carstens" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" In-Reply-To: <20260727-arch_do_panic-v1-1-ca1777547c38@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260727-arch_do_panic-v1-0-ca1777547c38@linux.ibm.com> <20260727-arch_do_panic-v1-1-ca1777547c38@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 09:09:06 +0000 Message-Id: <20260727090907.238DB1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Introduce a hook for architectures to put their specific panic handlers. > s390 and sparc already has ifdef preprocessor checks to execute > architecture specific code. Pave the way for vpanic() cleanup. >=20 > Suggested-by: Sven Schnelle > Signed-off-by: Mete Durlu Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260727-arch_do_pa= nic-v1-0-ca1777547c38@linux.ibm.com?part=3D1