From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F1F33FC5C3; Fri, 31 Jul 2026 13:26:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785504418; cv=none; b=fo5KPwlxw3KxUv/SRIaUs0sZPe/km+OKBkL+Iw/sQV13vwr+QG3YAayee202q8lBgEpcEr0pk1WW7akDurbso6jl+DhqXq3+bKuH/R+b6wFOYFujGQJkRCtyN3CCrTg9u/AyAgYZ3a6zQzgJ8g/l7parhrzOVDKX3uwF6F2jtI4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785504418; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NVvne0+trw7XQIiAGjdh69BfonWhMQVg22FqFSzanPM=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=RTDz+lhfFesS/gQoGB83WlA67pSlp3+l7/52D8oqYMchRq1Db2MKho6Ls/h1C7xASWBCyXtK/BkCLK3ZaTO1nvrATGFnq+vKj8jrlqQEBqxhT+Z0kMD+DLugBRnZREyJJ3lpzvACZr9Ld9dZDAgSfsEu71l8lz9O76OPPhpHLZ8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=nw8F2pwn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="nw8F2pwn" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2644D1F000E9; Fri, 31 Jul 2026 13:26:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785504416; bh=NVvne0+trw7XQIiAGjdh69BfonWhMQVg22FqFSzanPM=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=nw8F2pwn+0FJDvz0gdpFPqKaPiGMN/m/IrWKK8gPEwoTj3vD0xXl3eigvYGyiTvwK 97XfUu+vwh+oeCZpcUvMnVNBoUfEnESZsjXxrxQZkLiomRVDXSj14nRwVVUeKBMONe MGVlGDTqZLXouHX+govki6u50aPpAc5wiHjs3ILTR824aggybNDOOEVpnX6xQ/FDUj a6NhWOViE24ngQzvr8IYBDKKY6IfemymTGNucGAMah/08dQGFFQek/z8Tn5hh1YYii GQ7eWI9F9bHhDlD/PrLVqEwdmtEwyoz1dC4/QQdbU5XtyTACCdPOyjdjoDSsb4q1+I fODiUp4fmdE1g== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/31] KVM: arm64: Access elements of vcpu_gp_regs individually Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Steffen Eiden" Cc: "Oliver Upton" , "Heiko Carstens" , "Vasily Gorbik" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Marc Zyngier" , "Alexander Gordeev" In-Reply-To: <20260731130902.654679-8-seiden@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260731130902.654679-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com> <20260731130902.654679-8-seiden@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 13:26:55 +0000 Message-Id: <20260731132656.2644D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > While for arm64 the members of vcpu_gp_regs are allocated continuous > this is not necessarily true for other architectures implementing ARM. >=20 > Let vcpu_gp_regs() no longer return the address of the user_pt_regs in > the vcpu context but the address of the gp-register array field in the > user_pt_reg struct. Note, this change semantically excludes pc from the > GPRs. >=20 > No functional change. >=20 > Co-developed-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch > Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch > Signed-off-by: Steffen Eiden Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260731130902.6546= 79-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com?part=3D7