From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A63EE415F39 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2026 09:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785923782; cv=none; b=qRTDukY3ziUduz3Ne+XDXzB2UIzRO6sE99rWWL8B+a5u7xmqRgqU9mq9wfIyBgDnV+NCBbkea2sMM8bF5fsOPMfoIAxKRUW5ZA5xEnv00r2LuowqFvcxMU6Fgq9H0N4eTL3pC02yXXVMxgHHPRzG5864FIvhmkW3mrD1tk3I380= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785923782; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1AKHT1i6Mon1cE5JLEtdrgMZjc7Blcp2pVt31zAF89Y=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=M9akW7uwzsQ1RYTfGfW4r2SjY4t3E1rGGClCWtMXVor9h5ppOfTFLufUD+8zmJXDZ5yEApiyuPfjkCTs3dLH4R52CzLSgAG/0O2KMVwi8T3cdnoA0kwEEZ8VWxEK15e1pVx1d+JCJFVcL+PnLHX3RTPZhXC80IGutcw40eCfd+M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=QRthJyTg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QRthJyTg" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E536C1F00A3A; Wed, 5 Aug 2026 09:56:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785923781; bh=1AKHT1i6Mon1cE5JLEtdrgMZjc7Blcp2pVt31zAF89Y=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=QRthJyTgqZBrtEyTagyHEVP5v0a/I2I+EPZ2A+pJxLhIdzPgBk5q9KKUbMWduY66t h9h2RQDLA61YHWGa6vPkgr1qdx8xu4X8qe2uo5lpvUzOazbPqFNQj40dbUCw0HxtUf 9UJoI9E1McEZzItwK0QTdADRwVs8390Ogkkr5eCyqJThfX1KDklM6x1gthvtR2akGb 96KuxctnRdLZNxow7cf7RIUdTvjOaDUOppMPObQ6i4XQ0ZicdJJMrFv6kRpAMqBDrg GErOb8//gOUl40O9DxpH9gIyZOwYVLWIOWkjJxlfoAH12Fk+/hH5sQi9VW96MnFWaD 9May2+04fTJ5A== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] s390: Implement arch_do_panic() Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Mete Durlu" Cc: "Heiko Carstens" , "Vasily Gorbik" , "Alexander Gordeev" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260805-arch_do_panic-v4-2-af4a36f99414@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260805-arch_do_panic-v4-0-af4a36f99414@linux.ibm.com> <20260805-arch_do_panic-v4-2-af4a36f99414@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 09:56:20 +0000 Message-Id: <20260805095620.E536C1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Implement s390 specific arch_do_panic() instead of using s390 specific > ifdef sections in vpanic() code. > No functional changes. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Mete Durlu Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260805-arch_do_pa= nic-v4-0-af4a36f99414@linux.ibm.com?part=3D2