From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F1803F44C0 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2026 09:30:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787563847; cv=none; b=sEsOS4c18rufUW5vZGprOqkv74VtTxrnLN61PDePfruEFjsb9u7zNfTjD4cWdx2aEeZ6dyx973lUAv68pCQP9tdpmFU9XIlbe/W3rlrb3pDgLsmrpgdFtTZL+8qHtO6ZmXiw4vFoTnWY56sL6+uPVz4ZzUVmhD7+88xDoSvopnA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787563847; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JBcBX0J2+Smqjce3rFv8x9rAFNhJkeXxfqxwi80+xHA=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=uz+cWxqsJdbC/04NJqQ2GB/MzVHFXWr3yIjn6MWkpSq0icyV5GX9uuEousSfylP8s7IvNiTmAIhWA1uCiRXFrXVb0lidKY7dy23/lUw6VSWGhdf5t8Uyodi09I3p/u9678cjjZSScnfHleLLsSNmfuFkr9HjrHkpccHa+h7Vmj4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=AwomDNJJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="AwomDNJJ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BEFC21F000E9; Mon, 24 Aug 2026 09:30:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1787563846; bh=JBcBX0J2+Smqjce3rFv8x9rAFNhJkeXxfqxwi80+xHA=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=AwomDNJJJubiZhYbNg6uM2fv5ZVOPWJkbzMOrEK9GnnYBbUUwOjtyw25n2k2Sj9tz WwNy4EJu0AA942h0H9jEOvtrQg54oUHsAEM7QVDubf6EoYxq1XkBGQBksXe4O45ETK Tb/fQS+lws76KWvmRuqO9IrbaKz4i/s+N/LZdhapN097b3zet+oJuptqnoluZ6GIsD EuO9PBsyKCs07LK3yPyUBPxbTeRBp2/33IoU5q1L2I9jke+0CvX1iml5vmyA2jLNmQ mppJWKPIaanpsrExSi+wo6cnh0mOdtoZe4oSo1A+9yAQ0MRzBhFncMO2UohOnZFWge yn0HF8raCTo1g== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] s390/pai: Use PAI PMU index as parameter replacing event Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Thomas Richter" Cc: "Heiko Carstens" , "Alexander Gordeev" , "Vasily Gorbik" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Christian Borntraeger" In-Reply-To: <20260824092036.3075553-2-tmricht@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260824092036.3075553-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com> <20260824092036.3075553-2-tmricht@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 09:30:45 +0000 Message-Id: <20260824093045.BEFC21F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Use PAI PMU index value as function argument instead of pointer > to struct perf_event. Only that index value is used inside > functions pai_alloc_cpu() and pai_event_destroy_cpu(). > No functional change. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260824092036.3075= 553-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com?part=3D1