From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BDDE411680 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2026 12:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787574749; cv=none; b=o8QCKnP0Jd37KxLcfugWKhTxXASRPl3HS+duN1iIHroGih4Jsmvk3wqu1XdsuMPM+ZBbx513rpdkOXa7O2THockFl5QJLrcVqhE80m9sMoRgLmkfFCCdPfiJOCUtXq1eDF+X1d9m3bZhPhcIbQlwVQsg7zUw9c1JS3wXlCWevpE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787574749; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mTfLaI5BfNNSUV4AovMnZkkQadBbALMv/ABoL49xCvY=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=R+QMebbi6QI0jOBi7xxCdwEk6Y24qxut5bSRkGOuYMJhhwMrepMpilBTu75SGwKZKNGsISwdQSvEdNFQkU8RZd3dck/p+DVpEplA8ltZsA3Krc5E++OrCoj/eLX63zWTmtdUgd2SCyljFVVDtVqoqf3P5Q/LD8c/dW5CKUFJzWY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=K3CubvCa; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="K3CubvCa" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9953C1F000E9; Mon, 24 Aug 2026 12:32:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1787574748; bh=mTfLaI5BfNNSUV4AovMnZkkQadBbALMv/ABoL49xCvY=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=K3CubvCa/fKglEIStUw/CBp0p0GTwb1KalKBki6GNSmykqeHdfWIwop47hYxBTof+ jsWuNs+tPuXzjYeaj5RnDWY1Pi9vwVuozhqwhbJUkIpPZLCVtREFpiYQhfu5BZMjjf aoqcRvvb11Cbd4hErF4Cg+lwyH9VCtx4mUobRS6zJdiC5BME7RwYaKNWlCLRrdX/o1 xXFoJ5DwSYb3r3F54vGb6T8ph74OWBqN+gWpY0YFegJk/Be8h0dVeEyBUljxSYFn6j xeXtlk5Gu86K+qobLCeZHteSf+pSWXxM/AJodO4ZSFewxiKpyCEGbsS8/qLy/kzYda PPjnUXyLbIXWg== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] s390/pai: Use PAI PMU index as parameter replacing event Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Thomas Richter" Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" , "Alexander Gordeev" , "Christian Borntraeger" , "Heiko Carstens" In-Reply-To: <20260824122307.86133-2-tmricht@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260824122307.86133-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com> <20260824122307.86133-2-tmricht@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 12:32:27 +0000 Message-Id: <20260824123227.9953C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Use PAI PMU index value as function argument instead of pointer > to struct perf_event. Only that index value is used inside > functions pai_alloc_cpu() and pai_event_destroy_cpu(). > No functional change. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260824122307.8613= 3-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com?part=3D1