From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 763373D3D0E for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 07:38:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787643526; cv=none; b=rkiMt5fqEQmVxGhdwnH8k9yT3Fkc/ob5j5ZtcdFs7ap+rgGN3LXVFHMVeWeuQSRbtKYCfcRPrrc6dmgT+HEf6QYi5iqM8WGXbNs6ayPznglNJHc0lSFMz6ZXMO1zpPwCbw4/q5YWJFWEfOo4wb7mX3Sr9ZzijsznZ2wad/QnT5w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787643526; c=relaxed/simple; bh=S5PlGGIqACCcsBZ28Cl1MJEc5JDWnxcCz8OFsjZBWjE=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=sFiuF9giLw/I4U0EJknePnbQw7N1OZiKhPlZ9BKgkWtwElh8mT0B7pSkbOeaUzIGOHiLdlvN4CrE/PowoFvdfqelWOAorJnG/UCr7E4eUa3/hD3H0IJL8vMG6G3jKSKJPoBWQnh92LEroaCJTXBxbrGijW/HjAkUyMwQonaFtHs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ME4ruvj+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ME4ruvj+" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B04C31F000E9; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 07:38:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1787643525; bh=S5PlGGIqACCcsBZ28Cl1MJEc5JDWnxcCz8OFsjZBWjE=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=ME4ruvj+CsrOXW/aZLX+PnqOmLLctGHXG2e7Yj/XqkqzlRjcos7pvJ1vdPCoKMyYk 9NXoXZ7O01XNvqPp9QfouVConAjVENqa4m7Iokv2j9zNKClGyn11pzhwzVQc/DeiPS R7efCAhYDu93hOKROu9duliTanvYSr0CkpXYWD8ybVm+sW/1qhI/dQYRYkOO7DtpgK bDd3oWqOWfhfge8qGAwQ3qn12bOyfrKKs+Y6b+Sdob9YiW3stGlEfQ8BbbHhDbYEvO CeXdOuzti8VapcwSLNN9thbakGfIoB40mVATzMACr3nHXjomSyQInMlKR+YFVQog4N ji/Mzplwam3Rw== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] s390/pai: Use PAI PMU index as parameter replacing event Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Thomas Richter" Cc: "Heiko Carstens" , "Christian Borntraeger" , "Vasily Gorbik" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Alexander Gordeev" In-Reply-To: <20260825072931.3738180-2-tmricht@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260825072931.3738180-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com> <20260825072931.3738180-2-tmricht@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 07:38:44 +0000 Message-Id: <20260825073844.B04C31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Use PAI PMU index value as function argument instead of pointer > to struct perf_event. Only that index value is used inside > functions pai_alloc_cpu() and pai_event_destroy_cpu(). > No functional change. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260825072931.3738= 180-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com?part=3D1