From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 834CD3FA5EC for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 10:07:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788170854; cv=none; b=c2oZwdQZzhdiIDqUx+q1xN7T24TG89elJ4wHgL7pWIrNhxuPq6v4mKGJGKN2tNJ7UwkY/CuNU3Me0s46F54HvGytM3j0XjYnb0e80CSrLpaijC//Ve/+iN6kJJy8yN8iK3CcbMqwgBQZlTWPVdgEGpBV4vDJUqZfovUjw1/hsGk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788170854; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Rq9g1AkYCiVXaiFgD+SiCwalpEy7uJf7/AJK6GjN5Xw=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=EYN64si3AyNYcDPcK7kVAQxJttFRWdG5mtzN4WX5KeOBDhgFUTXz8BN3ca4yrE+Dn6quuSAIOFxZm8GUUJD2gmui0QDaeUoKLpCrYM6n95b41gQdBvhhP4KMm/0Epq1Q9YejWhcURP2kXwy2VlvDwd0rhibl6xF2nT9CPBxRfYU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=SvyeYwr+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SvyeYwr+" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0FA291F000E9; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 10:07:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788170853; bh=Rq9g1AkYCiVXaiFgD+SiCwalpEy7uJf7/AJK6GjN5Xw=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=SvyeYwr+UrgJvwmB83LNRmEgOlmbfnPIDR1H93ae38NUGXlQwAMdD8rUELuXnQrkx +CPvTka02gNT6l4CY1mY3JMT5U1Ef/Yktxrw3iN6JRnPpuuTdtBy+Qu5hufTG55NpF xcvVSX8sHGF2eEBH7ntzRcH1sX4LlgOTZYXeyuko7hEOGj0HONCnFDAZ3Fxj6uuhFw foiA092PN0F/nBtt21WRGSENj8rE2XBc7WVii3XuGGUNaLRzv2JNKv78fKH12E42ET UvPRD2fI4Q8GebktdTUz9cVjv9ssfsIiXyDJ0jAm+hO7vgNgd47de7Hy+9Ykl5//iH cvrgGsxso2dbA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] panic: Introduce arch_do_panic Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Mete Durlu" Cc: "Vasily Gorbik" , "Alexander Gordeev" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" , "Christian Borntraeger" In-Reply-To: <20260831-arch_do_panic-v6-1-a1e170a9e7fd@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260831-arch_do_panic-v6-0-a1e170a9e7fd@linux.ibm.com> <20260831-arch_do_panic-v6-1-a1e170a9e7fd@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 10:07:32 +0000 Message-Id: <20260831100733.0FA291F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Introduce a hook for architectures to put their specific panic handlers. > s390 and sparc already has ifdef preprocessor checks to execute > architecture specific code. Pave the way for vpanic() cleanup. >=20 > Reviewed-by: Bradley Morgan > Suggested-by: Sven Schnelle > Signed-off-by: Mete Durlu Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260831-arch_do_pa= nic-v6-0-a1e170a9e7fd@linux.ibm.com?part=3D1