From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E10972475D0 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 10:14:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788171284; cv=none; b=Gob9wdHIh2OrN4fKIvcqZFgv/c8PYXYLi11LhPbNNyXbpxe2HCtFvqMoLhuOIKZSrOLpEyfSJzpNQUJ9xdcr30dkGB/cpJLJqMFcbo8y1+FfP36BKDJ8+gOy/pTTuFlJlsdlSiWM/omXEs4IBtib3IPevr8ZVuceplr/xRILi1E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788171284; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aPQii3u7oRASDQ5j3/QfGpi++qeqmBLrTTV0wjoTMAs=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=gYUHmtVG5Vn0FmLTn4AMSz8lU8IJOPtUC6XQo7nSoOY8ymYW9IIcSfKEIFtS/vw0kv0rL2yeSrWGJJUtTm0+PVzHnVxQAlhDzSx6/eWOxweowwa1L4kGS/3tJDH5R46f/t3zi+Pkg6NwhnnFzJthCjBjlmH8HUQz1du4hnr45ig= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=S2KNLIzN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="S2KNLIzN" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0FBAE1F000E9; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 10:14:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788171282; bh=aPQii3u7oRASDQ5j3/QfGpi++qeqmBLrTTV0wjoTMAs=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=S2KNLIzNMUGHgCVg91H5V4El+X1Rc8nXbzRtU8cN/r5h5U2b8OEeqIfEdeRjvGfer eZE+HhkvAKY7erNKHT2O+rkX8n4fJH7mOufz+jfr9iYlzg1jPZhLIeStyn3x8KmbgH uGa8ATT82i/W/346Rl29726e0y3JuIqAO1Q96PxKY+ravx4F9kncAvTv+qN6LUHdWQ vStsEfWb+RgWcZ6vSTV5xpR9ht3y9WicddF9H57YTXXMjHrUpXKd4w3vQ+7Bifhioj qqo0K75+iePb3xwryVFK1Zkjdmkaa+c1UG9hwH2PwqGCcoPyBvpqnB4//4wXbfgDz8 Gh51rK28jbSqQ== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] s390: Implement arch_do_panic Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Mete Durlu" Cc: "Christian Borntraeger" , "Vasily Gorbik" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" , "Alexander Gordeev" In-Reply-To: <20260831-arch_do_panic-v6-2-a1e170a9e7fd@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260831-arch_do_panic-v6-0-a1e170a9e7fd@linux.ibm.com> <20260831-arch_do_panic-v6-2-a1e170a9e7fd@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 10:14:41 +0000 Message-Id: <20260831101442.0FBAE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Implement s390 specific arch_do_panic() instead of using s390 specific > ifdef sections in vpanic() code. disabled_wait() is now called after > "end Kernel panic" marker. > No functional changes. >=20 > Acked-by: Heiko Carstens > Reviewed-by: Bradley Morgan > Signed-off-by: Mete Durlu Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260831-arch_do_pa= nic-v6-0-a1e170a9e7fd@linux.ibm.com?part=3D2