From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9634A43F4A6; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 18:31:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788201094; cv=none; b=pP9md0PYv1RzvHkxxXXV7Nsn4+UG5d+xIU6jJ5MXaZxB4iKMnqIDfctnGrlYpyCK1XaOd+MVLauDxCuVnlyo8FDtt5LL2zFgIa9a1zeU4VrTpQholW4kmb5JeWeXW93kSpuotMtsOmq+nCyhxWplD1gFrc/+1ML+WeBA1ffqO+s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788201094; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HgM4xW3DYqKCIcEp9WREf1exvmSXtXkRb+r+5KhjeEQ=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=WQbCVPuwGCjXzVgSwcHDg91EM0CWg9YGZaeu1okh9eGwakUrMJvuD//vtzb6vCKLUWmkB+r1yF4Q3UUR1QysNQEI2ixmK94o1esH8bp7e34SVpA0mUMmZa073gxkB59N6bmnq8eQsDaIAjj2fQbE3tNvLG7mA5gL2AHAZeXN59g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Ow8liS0b; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Ow8liS0b" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7AF121F000E9; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 18:31:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788201093; bh=HgM4xW3DYqKCIcEp9WREf1exvmSXtXkRb+r+5KhjeEQ=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=Ow8liS0bBbs0vNjSB0N+RwsOBuQu53ESFdAItDWR77CV7MMr6ZDQ3XhiE8EZdnmsB oRHKQgH99NvraIGgcrVoI0vZBbM2VKsHVL/s90vvFupYGKQIK/th9EVwzgxatUbLuV lThvU8qPIWUIQFj3pm1hzYOU+PU4oMc9QVtNCQxBqG+iInWZLhz6q4PXsNgLQJY+xi Jue11pOB16y560CFhHUqPwefaxy2Uj/IqdYXCoK9pw3dE4EXTswwkZG+XSrLWA4aUn W017A8uYBvAsaH2MSmopQHt7FANBO2Fk7S916Rn6jyR8po7xQMr6gMPjWadZU8Euug pvTC/E9zkI7GQ== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/20] arm64: Share more arm64 headers with s390 Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Steffen Eiden" Cc: "Oliver Upton" , "Marc Zyngier" , "Alexander Gordeev" , "Heiko Carstens" , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Christian Borntraeger" , "Vasily Gorbik" In-Reply-To: <20260831145536.913567-5-seiden@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260831145536.913567-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com> <20260831145536.913567-5-seiden@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 18:31:32 +0000 Message-Id: <20260831183132.7AF121F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Mark more headers as shared or move definitions to an already shared > location if the context is similar. Most of them are required to > implement system register handling for the host. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Steffen Eiden Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260831145536.9135= 67-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com?part=3D4