From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 853C6440A34; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 18:31:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788201100; cv=none; b=fuLcmXvddGnbH0Tw2lKPr0Gxi/CR11HxqpV+hhtnXO+58TwF5kLVsO8HmwkfAsJU6XdyV4kk7oYG+b0dX1VWpS1rF0tQtZ0b1hulg9QtrF/upRYAYHpbZf02LeOcErrH3AYLHm36OM8xWIoyWwibQwaTgRj+0tih7LXiNpMS5ys= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788201100; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eD8eDtIiz9rQ0ERT/AV/3gjAc+UneoUbjTwiLdazZ20=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=OOXmQ+8ZxCKwxM1uUsF/t8s8i54B3GnvroyAiyf2ta//F5zY0vsSvva3/bCeaWDfGlcS//QVqgaikQVCl8P5EYL634AtQ0cUGkCDp1rI1ZeIH7Dsn5TYqpKDxpidBYiIkAITdg0+Qw5NVG0NRK54IZxhjR0CBQ+gwU4gfe3k4qg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OXfBZSTc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OXfBZSTc" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8AD561F000E9; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 18:31:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788201099; bh=eD8eDtIiz9rQ0ERT/AV/3gjAc+UneoUbjTwiLdazZ20=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=OXfBZSTc6S1Q/v5di7iHk/ioASZz7PkzoXE6yhUQB45uq2z/jihOIVZX03+Tjtlp/ hDCSL8Ic2Y7jvznf7DFJahu6j4u9uyOcO/clCGcMKnE+MsRdWdi5GkFdj/RCNqcrhO kpYjhWoAyZ7ANCbQcYOB4kKnk3Wk9Y3BGjoAPaeeBoZefVVib4vLxKc3kMj9ZZgEXt lcc1w6zIpXnjLqvIhTvj6aL141lodEkTUqE9LY72SkDFHbSYqTY26xL3qJD+ugcftv juicYMpuDKq7ny1TynQ8MTFfKRuEVAiAyR3DZu+uB9fnKl2iwnh0zZQnFi2ljLuk0U M2pY4L86EBV9Q== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/23] KVM: Allow KVM implementations to switch off MMIO independent of Kconfig Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Steffen Eiden" Cc: "Heiko Carstens" , kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Alexander Gordeev" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Marc Zyngier" , "Oliver Upton" , "Christian Borntraeger" , kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" In-Reply-To: <20260831144802.834315-4-seiden@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260831144802.834315-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com> <20260831144802.834315-4-seiden@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 18:31:38 +0000 Message-Id: <20260831183138.8AD561F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Only defining KVM_MMIO is not flexible enough for multi-KVM systems > where one KVM implements MMIO but others do not. Solve this by > additionally testing for the non-existence of KVM_NO_MMIO before > including MMIO code to KVM. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Steffen Eiden Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260831144802.8343= 15-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com?part=3D3