From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4B8437C929; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 19:47:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788205659; cv=none; b=AeUopUgKvnyDsH68zsLc6GZm+Krb2rIjQRG1uZEJS61nXHO69mQ0jEAkQ6EpXEl6AO7T1HVS74up+kP2caEg1OUi5VKz2jZ8aPVfv4gU7e2DCA9ucA4P4M1tpb3UHh2jkbeLSk3wjJRhIf+EJqPjVEJ/fvGPRqJTg/nCpMjRLuU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788205659; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VWpkDLHIxn5IfyDTw2NQCp5z3LOm6J9PIB8ucl/94+U=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=rYtDRDvzGdJAoN5DC/3qi/gml2KVsADxrjlXhXKr/kpPbh1jSQ9k+54/2BvbAYuF6H8UxjGuNW93OVYSQYGu5pJt52J8cT2TqN4n9AzmONh+uz5btBm2aXr/yKC3aLbEo6moDZ32Dkk5Ptb5mY2lJIL4na98tOp/5O6WlxX+smw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=nP8/2rYB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="nP8/2rYB" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0BCAD1F000E9; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 19:47:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788205657; bh=VWpkDLHIxn5IfyDTw2NQCp5z3LOm6J9PIB8ucl/94+U=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=nP8/2rYBwrckosHNPrdcNOnLYCn0MP8HexUf2tdVm7G8ct6T+JzZs3mj/YEqLS4So 4oulQ52ZZnRVJRj00h6dUa932bRyW9F+35DU1s+XAnOtiYC7pKDRfm9bZHNA9C0PL0 tiT7BAQHuewEI3KTwYYdi+TbWEozxVRpKjUAhZRy4PPkmu0Wq9b279p21O4N99tHzy oAGoq4oyFsjMkwCQIztBch22ftIp/p3srARkkslfw71+lZLurJnQqx78N0+EreACGh vvX4L1aHCfzV5rgylQTpwlp4uuQS2cIVJ993bqITdkKHyEfXdNFyL+BsxkPRLrKrwr 0J6MKyT8G1FqA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 14/23] KVM: s390: Prepare KVM/s390 for a second KVM module Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Steffen Eiden" Cc: "Alexander Gordeev" , "Marc Zyngier" , "Vasily Gorbik" , kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Christian Borntraeger" , "Heiko Carstens" , "Oliver Upton" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260831144802.834315-15-seiden@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260831144802.834315-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com> <20260831144802.834315-15-seiden@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 19:47:36 +0000 Message-Id: <20260831194737.0BCAD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > The second KVM module will have a different Kconfig set. When both > modules are compiled the Kconfig sets get merged and the native s390 KVM > needs to implement functionality required by the respective config > options. Ensure that s390-KVM will still compile by implementing a stub > for kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change if CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_VCPU_RUN_PID_CHANGE > is enabled and defining KVM_NO_MMIO to disable KVM_MMIO. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Steffen Eiden Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260831144802.8343= 15-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com?part=3D14