From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2094938E8DC; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 06:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788329742; cv=none; b=jbdEI3n/6e2idQbUUTmmKCa657qNb0dwkeNcn2KySP912RMqI7tQJRP5UmAj4qXOCXzvW6VuJbYRxql6a/6BDJoGaQgQnpnX1Hr3lVrSYmQDIK1AMQAKkOx7S33lg7AK7jVmpTQve7pe7CfVmUWRgskyykgXKmC+lSvEVvamrFU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788329742; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KjSvS6cVarz2EGcjO+qgUC/Z3Ug9TAUlDU9fkjFomJM=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=gTYhlirMuq/q7ouiOCcDnLPgrtLDuf+Uq9Sts2zFWNwilyg2+sp1Tqr0E1Zunsk+aJoBmB0wb4JliI7zruwiKj81nBSEd26b4OUoEyn32kKTu2IEmoiSzwxIg9bwn08b/4TvPBz5jpAm+0pZDge7u5YZTzKIqUEP5MKvpNBqN90= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=WvNXHcrx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WvNXHcrx" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 587011F000E9; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 06:15:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788329737; bh=YsA6hNpdDuoXhmxFeC3uv8uIXxR1ksQ/iBUtdB1feUs=; h=From:Date:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=WvNXHcrxV8JKaRtt3T+TgHowGmPOJ4H4MgCw7LvVDttuAHoV8YajbSc586+Rw1gFT 1fgWfos2HoEwwgGmf2fwT7rUv/cZnEG6lheWHkQhjlrHRPyeM6CgQ35aBMGDOlIDQb /fcMnjoLLunKuouuieMHEpD/HuxY9/fPUdnP1LS1tlXNxz4gZriv8nN3DIKHWLT+BK C9qIfJouDe3OtAGA5Rqgs8L3WfXmxVGyHhfOx0HskVeGN/LsdbVntcaw3cwgRNjaAs eydF7OqQZjyyls4A7K32MsYBafb4e24W6+SewzgGWol4DaaEcQIGEkf/29pCIx6ML/ Ts5YBGxnhGnGw== From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 09:15:14 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: s390: Replace get_zeroed_page() with kzalloc() for the STSI buffer Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20260902-s390-kvm-v1-2-3bc0986550b1@kernel.org> References: <20260902-s390-kvm-v1-0-3bc0986550b1@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260902-s390-kvm-v1-0-3bc0986550b1@kernel.org> To: Christian Borntraeger , Claudio Imbrenda , Janosch Frank Cc: Alexander Gordeev , David Hildenbrand , Heiko Carstens , Mike Rapoport , Sven Schnelle , Vasily Gorbik , Vlastimil Babka , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org X-Mailer: b4 0.17-dev handle_stsi() allocates the buffer that receives the STSI response block before it is copied to the guest. This buffer can be allocated with kmalloc() as there's nothing special about it to go directly to the page allocator. kmalloc() provides a better API that does not require ugly casts and kfree() does not need to know the size of the freed object. Performance difference between kmalloc() and __get_free_pages() is not measurable as both allocators take an object/page from a per-CPU list for fast path allocations. For the slow path the performance is anyway determined by the amount of reclaim involved rather than by what allocator is used. While on it, make the buffer a void pointer to get rid of the casts. Replace use of get_zeroed_page() with kzalloc() and free_page() with kfree(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/635405e4-9423-4a25-a6e7-e03c8ea0bcbe@redhat.com Assisted-by: copilot:claude-opus Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) --- arch/s390/kvm/s390/priv.c | 19 ++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/s390/priv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/s390/priv.c index b3cb2c2c3aa71..856939acf012f 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/s390/priv.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/s390/priv.c @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -869,7 +870,7 @@ static int handle_stsi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) int fc = (vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[0] & 0xf0000000) >> 28; int sel1 = vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[0] & 0xff; int sel2 = vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[1] & 0xffff; - unsigned long mem = 0; + void *mem = NULL; u64 operand2; int rc = 0; u8 ar; @@ -911,19 +912,19 @@ static int handle_stsi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) switch (fc) { case 1: /* same handling for 1 and 2 */ case 2: - mem = get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT); + mem = kzalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT); if (!mem) goto out_no_data; - if (stsi((void *) mem, fc, sel1, sel2)) + if (stsi(mem, fc, sel1, sel2)) goto out_no_data; break; case 3: if (sel1 != 2 || sel2 != 2) goto out_no_data; - mem = get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT); + mem = kzalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT); if (!mem) goto out_no_data; - handle_stsi_3_2_2(vcpu, (void *) mem); + handle_stsi_3_2_2(vcpu, mem); break; case 15: /* fc 15 is fully handled in userspace */ insert_stsi_usr_data(vcpu, operand2, ar, fc, sel1, sel2); @@ -931,10 +932,10 @@ static int handle_stsi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) return -EREMOTE; } if (kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu)) { - memcpy(sida_addr(vcpu->arch.sie_block), (void *)mem, PAGE_SIZE); + memcpy(sida_addr(vcpu->arch.sie_block), mem, PAGE_SIZE); rc = 0; } else { - rc = write_guest(vcpu, operand2, ar, (void *)mem, PAGE_SIZE); + rc = write_guest(vcpu, operand2, ar, mem, PAGE_SIZE); } if (rc) { rc = kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, rc); @@ -945,14 +946,14 @@ static int handle_stsi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) rc = -EREMOTE; } trace_kvm_s390_handle_stsi(vcpu, fc, sel1, sel2, operand2); - free_page(mem); + kfree(mem); kvm_s390_set_psw_cc(vcpu, 0); vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[0] = 0; return rc; out_no_data: kvm_s390_set_psw_cc(vcpu, 3); out: - free_page(mem); + kfree(mem); return rc; } -- 2.53.0