From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9AB24248DC; Fri, 4 Sep 2026 19:58:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788551914; cv=none; b=KSOGz4rpzpYquZxPXxXGVhX5eWLrSOALdcmp1gLvcI1fxBYFo1/gxsZfX0JGOcBIFS94iVWdbp/izWBK1pBHn00PdVLpBVfAu9gjVuiZux6/C6dUNyvKyCYCZXnrxeeUSfYArdToYzeI8lem/H+/bgy0AqW/dqAMAE62D8WbRic= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788551914; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1Vv9CaZbNEfXkEziZ9a9QrXWt+xf9re3CXJ8beITLbs=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=uyLRu0YiriLaQEsv+Wg6g8F2PNpHUiEjC1i5euWlRGzC2tv+ZggPoIfQp17eRoA/iQ+XTCyIdh01gUyvNW6w2nIGuZkIawyaN9uZ0EkjIuCi3xC+KPyBzUsvmEhLqF9jen0KJc5uW9u5hMsevaBkupB+aRRCPs4tut+EZkZ1B5A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZWsx/Cq5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZWsx/Cq5" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC8861F00A3D; Fri, 4 Sep 2026 19:58:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788551911; bh=1Vv9CaZbNEfXkEziZ9a9QrXWt+xf9re3CXJ8beITLbs=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=ZWsx/Cq5sQr3nbq2NCmkTjkRNkucc1sRqnO/MDVAhoO4Qq1CfV/jP8k0EkefLCTKF EKUtTepLooFMpsVgw7G8ZN9UrtYV7vmhllKbgaYLL/Df6FDBWtm/qpEWEVAl1V25/A 0rKeqaHl/4cjQO4MtmUxueDG7ZXkGQT4KxYDpNnrp0nW0NrpEvW9oucYCH2s7/sypP 223enUZCwnoJCjXFDcml8EzoOn4ewsp1NyYmsRzHw49fCuzmCJfaJl8GF/dhfeBDaL DnmNK467tnRoIKC2OxK3KZgr6ygDJzV1K/Rxb/IH+52CAz+XHhQoTOjXkUKToZ0s/l lzjNEbgjina2g== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 7/7] selftests/bpf: Test timed may_goto with private stacks Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Siddharth Chintamaneni" Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" , "Vasily Gorbik" , bpf@vger.kernel.org, "Christian Borntraeger" , "Alexander Gordeev" In-Reply-To: <20260904195132.141068-8-sidchintamaneni@gmail.com> References: <20260904195132.141068-1-sidchintamaneni@gmail.com> <20260904195132.141068-8-sidchintamaneni@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 19:58:30 +0000 Message-Id: <20260904195830.DC8861F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Add private_stack_timed_may_goto() with enough stack usage to select a > private stack. Check that the JIT uses the private-stack frame pointer > when constructing the pointer passed to the architecture trampoline. >=20 > Update the translated instruction expectations in may_goto_batch_2(), > may_goto_interaction_x86_64(), and may_goto_interaction() for the > additional pointer construction instruction and adjusted branch offsets. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Siddharth Chintamaneni Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260904195132.1410= 68-1-sidchintamaneni@gmail.com?part=3D7