From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82B3F424654; Fri, 4 Sep 2026 20:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788552122; cv=none; b=bddCZlvaMnlghxl1UZF2uJlUlddmivP8x11XcccYuhBkkWgQ0lY55mzX11tYvBAaAXaP1za4utFo0z3J18bGIEfPstfqQ1D1w0+Cu97D82OwowZGoorNkC8ZskM2b8MX1vN53uGcXtpKrTEmrHHI8wTxLnNFkh86bZ4KvcLdNOk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788552122; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jOU0sre9oMl/M5oo9jNE1bA6DwheS6hYNT/z3OIHmQc=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=AQIDPVe3AtoUui9QqlOVSgI7fHuPVA3xALrtcOYXD6d/XQcO8Y23U5SzHVMzhayBIklB+iiYiTjz4S+uceB0/dOQp0p9jyWkdemspCER8ouXQbUNPrXpizpYtacoWyW9x70iuHGYwcdGgDTiO2eogGeTz6X7wQ7ylXq0cQeBjGA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jKcE4Lkg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jKcE4Lkg" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C30541F00A3F; Fri, 4 Sep 2026 20:02:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788552121; bh=jOU0sre9oMl/M5oo9jNE1bA6DwheS6hYNT/z3OIHmQc=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=jKcE4LkgOxxJDhL7VkB9IEF9nNWLOnh8Dz5kPyb5TLSIu+q0LoGSETcMdiz1OAdVb ywfqa9kC8OCTKgIA8gFvfpRnXUXDjCkoj1p1ShTbvuIyCNNkixccm2r/sxp04sSZ8J U6FT8T43gkVEpGu2PvQMe4SmEVpFKX7wbTizkGUIn4k43OYAeyTkWQjUrCVQzLhLmR c4MhLhHmGiElee09b/qSKUm2goPkth/MEET5kxEevbHSJfFcwljNqaGFFZJKmTh/3y 5PAQJ5VZ9WM/8JoGKT3yUM8UQ0IsFidcB0i+nRnFiePfAZtxL/KOFuc+7t7MsLSMld eLBfc/l09QsDw== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/7] bpf, x86: Use resolved pointer for timed may_goto Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Siddharth Chintamaneni" Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Alexander Gordeev" , "Christian Borntraeger" , bpf@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" , "Heiko Carstens" In-Reply-To: <20260904195132.141068-3-sidchintamaneni@gmail.com> References: <20260904195132.141068-1-sidchintamaneni@gmail.com> <20260904195132.141068-3-sidchintamaneni@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 20:02:00 +0000 Message-Id: <20260904200200.C30541F00A3F@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > The timed may_goto fixup now passes the resolved counter pointer through > BPF_REG_AX instead of a stack offset. >=20 > Use the pointer directly rather than adding it to RBP. This preserves the > private-stack address selected by the JIT through R9. >=20 > Fixes: 2fb761823ead ("bpf, x86: Add x86 JIT support for timed may_goto") > Reported-by: Jeremy Jean > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260824213158.3755932-2-Jeremy.Jean@os= s.cyber.gouv.fr/ > Signed-off-by: Siddharth Chintamaneni Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260904195132.1410= 68-1-sidchintamaneni@gmail.com?part=3D2