From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64B0C45518D for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2026 09:13:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788945226; cv=none; b=JajYBUgdBTgLpXT3jeL/mb6CugosclEV36GTPJgE64opZD4CELzerSyWgCqdL+Dj+QuQw8Vi0HMYRa8QDzwnwPiLYDywFi0NOjrTmc7aoFZ3Ue80+k069PVvCjowNj8Ig/qfDl/yBUonDO443fimpMSo4P1vNJRpcLStdpEG7mQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788945226; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OgDgHubAwsB/AOPaPSFNh+EsFC7sSIX5Ap6wBhFgAf4=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=L6gcCYuZylaD2MVmIgxGg0jjFSvSwTzPKPxmDmFXsquRJbLRLfnX0J7h+x6zkUu4hdRzQh2+2cAi4SEzW7CoJk4AldU3NBMGPXXtKpgpnUE0jq0Kzhx/ljQBHg2PS0jrxR6mmfqR4zRcYFiWtUO4gbhknYPVtaSa2aFvIAKsvkE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=F5EA/X/r; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="F5EA/X/r" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 889E21F00A3D; Wed, 9 Sep 2026 09:13:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788945223; bh=OgDgHubAwsB/AOPaPSFNh+EsFC7sSIX5Ap6wBhFgAf4=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=F5EA/X/rQVPwE3mZuFXy2rf5FuZ6IPRwEdZ7PIA/Iviete7vI9vOnhIxPWffBrucj SOGb7k52QCSvCAwcEhz4xRzKEltLzxbisihpGnwv+2SDOf/OGrBMJPXSoggrQs/A3R J9uSXHGIA7iF+80FoJX8wzQ/ixKP+0NcEwUS4jhQHSQvaosbF/Pyp5PIG4Vx4ljeoN nafx11xDDd6mMLF3aw7Gc5FCHCHMn8A8PL06Gj1GOuj1VKUxIh7Tnmx8S2jPp15f62 BP7nbeYnpARcP1a9tQdSEIwzQIsSRQKsuNxEoha4r2aAKouj7Ddsd0UM7O9/SStKKS 085JeC1O6DjiQ== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/15] vdso/vsyscall: Define fallback time synchronization functions in vsyscall.c Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: =?utf-8?b?VGhvbWFzIFdlacOfc2NodWg=?= Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Alexander Gordeev" , "Vasily Gorbik" , "Heiko Carstens" , "Christian Borntraeger" In-Reply-To: <20260909-vdso-asm-generic-vsyscall-h-v1-4-63ae856cc659@linutronix.de> References: <20260909-vdso-asm-generic-vsyscall-h-v1-0-63ae856cc659@linutronix.de> <20260909-vdso-asm-generic-vsyscall-h-v1-4-63ae856cc659@linutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 09:13:43 +0000 Message-Id: <20260909091343.889E21F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > __arch_update_vdso_clock() and __arch_sync_vdso_time_data() are only > used in vsyscall.c. vsyscall.h has become a dumping ground for different > kinds of fallbacks. >=20 > Move the fallback function definitions into vsyscall.c. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Thomas Wei=C3=9Fschuh Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260909-vdso-asm-g= eneric-vsyscall-h-v1-0-63ae856cc659@linutronix.de?part=3D4