From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 240D533FE0A for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2026 13:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789307449; cv=none; b=ZKT5nNOG5C4ZMlTFz5/ihYw2rDPPuTRvilODAhHDIRGHmM1Btma8SVV59Cwq3PmRe52sLGeJwEqgRNiMkMnZ3bRYQF99Lytj1jEMl5H+xAY9+uiZ+iuuFhjn9TilAl+QBEZ3pf8I0tWwoF4D32LVGIITSsb2RKC3w0M/zLzf5Fg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789307449; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Evtt58MuD5zXkJUeguVwxG2MmUzVd/WejoMUgQi+zkU=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=hympcF4gJiLfplg0Z5J/SOvRsCTC0MPKOPv/0UhfdRW7TCY+1gTL2pLVAA75yEHYqAYyhOoeikPpxK0xVYULVoxclVYN6+LxaSLVe2f3XnCTdBzTlbbRP1XaOIPbwyMAvh/jJReIjMqsEXTRdY1Rb9BPBkPp0gj39X4j4m8BAGM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=iDiRjjR1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="iDiRjjR1" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 64E231F000FF; Sun, 13 Sep 2026 13:50:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789307447; bh=Evtt58MuD5zXkJUeguVwxG2MmUzVd/WejoMUgQi+zkU=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=iDiRjjR10VuKL7CcblPZPYHXQOUvAxh+gThbbSwHmk1ECbmhA/BZaiv6sfMaweAWg E2E1aVnlk4LZXS+SsdTskJC3jl4N4K9ulNF8fLXpuVthOiJz1QJjAiXBiyv4OjX7u3 3esBBLSTm/aWG3wKOhN+9jpu60ASyAYwPg2ky7mlMJt2FKWIj8a00N10UoGxGw2Evj PPNGuP4msB/IGVRzlLCqLVEaHZ//muuX9/28J9ArpDEAWUgPqSvBrkBKAdYxCJwsEr zajjkiph2LYdSeDmHFDzcJH38QxToOFfppL9WHEQOyL7XmwOjPuwxbq2/S6QjAmP+p 76XD3yQnnlE0g== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] rtnetlink: pass extack to ndo_bridge_getlink() Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Artem Lytkin" Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" , "Vasily Gorbik" , "Christian Borntraeger" , "Alexander Gordeev" In-Reply-To: <20260912135022.1701-2-iprintercanon@gmail.com> References: <20260912135022.1701-1-iprintercanon@gmail.com> <20260912135022.1701-2-iprintercanon@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2026 13:50:46 +0000 Message-Id: <20260913135047.64E231F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Let the bridge report why it could not fill in the link info for a > port. rtnl_bridge_getlink() passes the dump extack, rtnl_bridge_notify() > gets one from its setlink and dellink callers. >=20 > No functional change. >=20 > Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5 > Signed-off-by: Artem Lytkin Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260912135022.1701= -1-iprintercanon@gmail.com?part=3D1