From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 686D830216D for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 15:18:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789571907; cv=none; b=ooaY7KoZh4xv2rYVujru5ZAbL63Lw/RvbPqdX9nQhfoF30trVwePXW/SKdNOM6LzvDhwZpELBk7PFUwssgPVsWsFatKzlN5wPEOPuWxGCO1/tfEAXOwllhUW1EE9Tn1bjGyQlmi1DPtAta9OIpVHEFk88EALuqvq+N5LbUaZfJQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789571907; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DvIMBNuRDZJaRrxVd8pFFfpuH8PA5qebfE7p3DI5AtE=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=ubntZ2Ywsw59qZpud+F92d3t5/ohjbmbogzX/3jOSSASNQOCY1qs14gsLge7/ukYR+yVCFNW+ayfLTeBAfQWGH7lU9OIxojmV2evKzynHJNpNp0RCYiecDHnLUIvsKoXqUUZyA8QGGNRfyrWUTF2o1qYRVvdl8y570zyqbezWE0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=W8U4AQ2T; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="W8U4AQ2T" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ABBA11F00893; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 15:18:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789571906; bh=DvIMBNuRDZJaRrxVd8pFFfpuH8PA5qebfE7p3DI5AtE=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=W8U4AQ2TnL/iaK4YED99ISxBvvidx1y+BOW67mMDIub+NK1aFSOOPVp4U7ojFYwvk jGAP2LT+XH3vm2N6Fr/xVzcKqtua5+SjkrB8LrAlfVeXdwMtU179wKdtzPHaRuHmfF ZR+9lXiCNSKa39SRiXs+feORsKLFZHwFlIY8KM1yLD+EheuQIfjdhDvHRGnFRIreqy pHbLyM62vwENfWFRdPKai9iKHRsTBNmjHqm1BKyUMVcEYR4UJnxz3MeuEt/5juYQFn wN7nvOt7XwHGOwIZyxmgXwKQ/+6WQUl2HUkCEtkmP4qN0wHMSumvyBd2GV0slHsX2Q g2HnamKlhfDqg== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] s390/pci: Don't report recovery success on skipped recovery Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Niklas Schnelle" Cc: "Alexander Gordeev" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Christian Borntraeger" , "Heiko Carstens" , "Vasily Gorbik" In-Reply-To: <20260916-fix_zpci_report_status_pdev_leak-v3-4-61a2f980e71d@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260916-fix_zpci_report_status_pdev_leak-v3-0-61a2f980e71d@linux.ibm.com> <20260916-fix_zpci_report_status_pdev_leak-v3-4-61a2f980e71d@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 15:18:25 +0000 Message-Id: <20260916151825.ABBA11F00893@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > When a PCI device is already in the permanent failure state, recovery is > skipped, but the SCLP recovery report still shows success. Fix this by > changing the status string to explicitly state that recovery was skipped > due to permanent failure. >=20 > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Fixes: 4ec6054e7321 ("s390/pci: Report PCI error recovery results via SCL= P") > Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260916-fix_zpci_r= eport_status_pdev_leak-v3-0-61a2f980e71d@linux.ibm.com?part=3D4