From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B18814E0B88 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2026 19:26:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789673218; cv=none; b=g49Rip2wG6HhNpV2MW1CPJgbywZ6HPCBTVM9dhTLOmn+zljMWFX6Woe24WTZXTlm4xhGH9PgL2pRfVrwrDADNp0c0jKtrM57D68ZAn1kLiQ3b+dOI6r5mtqYQ+Qq862hmuoFPYgtqATXDSCURHUNZLG064FRbgZGywopjO40wuo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789673218; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dAwAZua1yfpr07MO5oVjrL8kWADtkxLq9rwmdodNx6A=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=UJ2yqapYrEYIrOxW/1i7UqPf5XIixYR3wkc4hlfRGsVu4/0Tyngcy4/cyiWiavVXqXabsHVC3HLpei9cIYlJqOo9aMlkvel2YInq2p7NzdYjEaW6iR0l72e/mXbuk4HHXtZlgiJxwydtrI+4/mXgH4RlcGRDWeiGIuLclE3tCPA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=APtfrl33; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="APtfrl33" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E30201F000FF; Thu, 17 Sep 2026 19:26:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789673217; bh=dAwAZua1yfpr07MO5oVjrL8kWADtkxLq9rwmdodNx6A=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=APtfrl33ai46HGQh749skoaokWDfnhJbHBfuLQ5mSZZFQxStqYwuv9HGNyHX5n8of jqj/YGy0vyASfL9UqtWGai//JPXNUmvNcXRq/EdoyBYXKyerI/IGJdYr2JBN6WsQXF 5FgLmfNZn4U1GU9CiiOhBuZvaW2UoaTQ6LOkEojngUgdURVu5kZ0GwrF++a8qkWnHN Bewy3RJx5y/dhMwSWxiYsE+ehpeDlXq/5KFvY6FlcXJuDLzy9AaHM1QbgVI7qcC/lX vy/pn1WvRqkbu4tZV8rDpaqqdQaPKWpSxxbFBKAQYMCmCgu6cj4sjGSeDJ6r1QWCGX 63rfVhzDQ7iUA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] s390/percpu: Add sanity check to GEN_MVIY macro Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Heiko Carstens" Cc: "Christian Borntraeger" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" , "Alexander Gordeev" , "Heiko Carstens" In-Reply-To: <20260917192237.638324-3-hca@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260917192237.638324-1-hca@linux.ibm.com> <20260917192237.638324-3-hca@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 19:26:56 +0000 Message-Id: <20260917192656.E30201F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Emit an error if the GEN_MVIY macro fails to parse the passed register > string. This will make it more obvious if something similar which was > fixed with [1] happens again. >=20 > [1] commit 101782f8945a ("s390/percpu: Fix MVIY_PERCPU() with older binut= ils") >=20 > Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260917192237.6383= 24-1-hca@linux.ibm.com?part=3D2