From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D41B3921DC for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2026 19:29:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789673366; cv=none; b=edZ0bE5zg8rGqQSx/obtoLmO8uTmXXrBWEesGJZlZEQz3Yrr7N7nb5N11bv4bYhZoG+G1Obpf25ybVaHKcxRchSREx1KSPeH6g9Kb5ly/P7wC2w7AIV8y7aV8/kMpQUaiQSpJodIo7d+CGiWVwFWRO/iu96i2jtR4xKPvfdpo2w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789673366; c=relaxed/simple; bh=f9vo+6zrBSeFKmE/S1s0avjUHVNRgCTszv6JTDqZwIA=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=gwGgleM9tR4SuyBsmLO+oXZz8sRcBOOjav9YEKLfYEeH85xXwi4RaMbGPIXlcv+H2pMoRwpnHrmzm+VZUavgxrbiGepw/GRKp4XaTAxfufrQVdAetnDF7fDIMFfSf8sfayePXuD4pbRI2eMRUVacEFHpFHVsVex1+oRQbLlSLZs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=f04eQxUl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="f04eQxUl" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 95DD81F000FF; Thu, 17 Sep 2026 19:29:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789673365; bh=f9vo+6zrBSeFKmE/S1s0avjUHVNRgCTszv6JTDqZwIA=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=f04eQxUlGERKc8fsmRtFxhsMyOgOZ3bOp3MSSKqmcFWingE0zlBpK0OWy5dTVwFZc hl45a3/d3m+1SkRxFIiumHhbv8HYoyzaYYrKFaYiy5vGNJ0Ma0X+jZ2xhu8qEUjiyP 1WkMO+9c3UNrGlaEa2YtMCdylcLtN3ltqfzzOq2kB7SRr5/DnH5tXG7xjqyHdfVy++ I4rdUvQDv1F2h4u9/pgIOKrUdVmLPhy3ajYUXxR1nVwNAnpFOzXHEaNsLSWPF72Bbp b9RpCHNC80Nsyl7p8UzKfiNfA+08MYJvGz9W01R7j5hTUu86RV4JVGCxyprn4F+V71 EpsWbZT+2HbSw== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] s390/percpu: Use percpu code section for this_cpu_cmpxchg128() Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Heiko Carstens" Cc: "Christian Borntraeger" , "Vasily Gorbik" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" , "Alexander Gordeev" In-Reply-To: <20260917192237.638324-9-hca@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260917192237.638324-1-hca@linux.ibm.com> <20260917192237.638324-9-hca@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 19:29:24 +0000 Message-Id: <20260917192924.95DD81F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Convert this_cpu_cmpxchg128() to make use of percpu code section > functionality. This is just for the sake of completeness, since > currently there is no in-kernel user of this_cpu_cmpxchg128(). >=20 > Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260917192237.6383= 24-1-hca@linux.ibm.com?part=3D8